Gibson C Michael, Murphy Sabina A, Pride Yuri B, Kirtane Ajay J, Aroesty Julian M, Stein Erica B, Ciaglo Lauren N, Southard Matthew C, Sabatine Marc S, Cannon Christopher P, Braunwald Eugene
TIMI Study Group and Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
The use of routine nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after fibrinolytic therapy is unknown. We sought to evaluate the effect of nonemergent PCI on mortality among patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytic administration and the consequence of clopidogrel pretreatment on this effect.
CLARITY-TIMI 28 randomized 3491 patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytic administration and aspirin to clopidogrel or placebo. All patients were to undergo angiography 48 to 192 hours after randomization. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Nonemergent PCI, which was defined as PCI that was not precipitated by recurrent myocardial infarction, was performed in 1781 patients (55.7%).
Nonemergent PCI did not affect 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 2.3% among patients who did not undergo PCI). However, nonemergent PCI was associated with lower mortality among patients randomized to clopidogrel (1.3% vs 2.8%, P = .04) but not among those randomized to placebo (2.6% vs 1.7%, P = .25; interaction P = .025). In multivariate modeling, PCI remained associated with lower mortality among patients randomized to clopidogrel (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.92, P = .034) but not placebo (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.63-3.19, P = .40, interaction P = .028).
Among patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytic administration and aspirin, nonemergent PCI was associated with lower mortality among patients pretreated with clopidogrel. These results suggest that routine nonemergent PCI is beneficial among such patients, although further confirmatory randomized studies are needed.
对于接受纤维蛋白溶解疗法的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,常规非急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的使用情况尚不清楚。我们试图评估非急诊PCI对接受纤维蛋白溶解治疗的STEMI患者死亡率的影响,以及氯吡格雷预处理对该影响的作用。
CLARITY-TIMI 28试验将3491例接受纤维蛋白溶解治疗和阿司匹林治疗的STEMI患者随机分为氯吡格雷组或安慰剂组。所有患者在随机分组后48至192小时接受血管造影。经治医生酌情进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。1781例患者(55.7%)接受了非急诊PCI,非急诊PCI定义为非由复发性心肌梗死引发的PCI。
非急诊PCI不影响30天死亡率(未接受PCI的患者为2.0%,接受PCI的患者为2.3%)。然而,非急诊PCI与随机分组至氯吡格雷组患者的较低死亡率相关(1.3%对2.8%,P = 0.04),但与随机分组至安慰剂组的患者无关(2.6%对1.7%,P = 0.25;交互作用P = 0.025)。在多变量模型中,PCI与随机分组至氯吡格雷组患者的较低死亡率相关(比值比0.34,95%置信区间0.13 - 0.92,P = 0.034),但与安慰剂组无关(比值比1.41,95%置信区间0.63 - 3.19,P = 0.40,交互作用P = 0.028)。
在接受纤维蛋白溶解治疗和阿司匹林治疗的STEMI患者中,非急诊PCI与氯吡格雷预处理患者的较低死亡率相关。这些结果表明,常规非急诊PCI对此类患者有益,尽管需要进一步的验证性随机研究。