Chandy Hoeuy, Heng Yang Van, Samol Ha, Husum Hans
Trauma Care Foundation, Battambang, Cambodia.
Women Birth. 2008 Mar;21(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
We need solid estimates of maternal mortality rates (MMR) to monitor the impact of maternal care programs. Cambodian health authorities and WHO report the MMR in Cambodia at 450 per 100,000 live births. The figure is drawn from surveys where information is obtained by interviewing respondents about the survival of all their adult sisters (sisterhood method). The estimate is statistically imprecise, 95% confidence intervals ranging from 260 to 620/100,000. The MMR estimate is also uncertain due to under-reporting; where 80-90% of women deliver at home maternal fatalities may go undetected especially where mortality is highest, in remote rural areas. The aim of this study was to attain more reliable MMR estimates by using survey methods other than the sisterhood method prior to an intervention targeting obstetric rural emergencies.
The study was carried out in rural Northwestern Cambodia where access to health services is poor and poverty, endemic diseases, and land mines are endemic. Two survey methods were applied in two separate sectors: a community-based survey gathering data from public sources and a household survey gathering data direct from primary sources.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two survey results for maternal deaths, both types of survey reported mortality rates around the public figure. The household survey reported a significantly higher perinatal mortality rate as compared to the community-based survey, 8.6% versus 5.0%. Also the household survey gave qualitative data important for a better understanding of the many problems faced by mothers giving birth in the remote villages. There are detection failures in both surveys; the failure rate may be as high as 30-40%. PRINCIPLE CONCLUSION: Both survey methods are inaccurate, therefore inappropriate for evaluation of short-term changes of mortality rates. Surveys based on primary informants yield qualitative information about mothers' hardships important for the design of future maternal care interventions.
我们需要对孕产妇死亡率(MMR)进行可靠估计,以监测孕产妇保健项目的影响。柬埔寨卫生当局和世界卫生组织报告称,柬埔寨的孕产妇死亡率为每10万例活产中有450例死亡。该数据来自调查,通过询问受访者其所有成年姐妹的存活情况来获取信息(姐妹法)。该估计在统计学上并不精确,95%置信区间为每10万例中有260至620例。由于报告不足,孕产妇死亡率估计值也存在不确定性;80 - 90%的妇女在家分娩,孕产妇死亡情况可能未被发现,尤其是在死亡率最高的偏远农村地区。本研究的目的是在针对农村产科急症的干预措施实施之前,通过使用姐妹法以外的调查方法来获得更可靠的孕产妇死亡率估计值。
该研究在柬埔寨西北部农村地区开展,当地卫生服务可及性差,贫困、地方病和地雷问题普遍存在。在两个不同地区应用了两种调查方法:一种是基于社区的调查,从公共来源收集数据;另一种是家庭调查,直接从主要来源收集数据。
两种调查方法得出的孕产妇死亡结果在统计学上无显著差异,两种类型的调查所报告的死亡率均接近公布的数据。与基于社区的调查相比,家庭调查所报告的围产期死亡率显著更高,分别为8.6%和5.0%。此外,家庭调查还提供了定性数据,有助于更好地了解偏远村庄分娩母亲所面临的诸多问题。两种调查均存在漏报情况;漏报率可能高达30 - 40%。主要结论:两种调查方法都不准确,因此不适用于评估死亡率的短期变化。基于主要信息提供者的调查产生了关于母亲艰难处境的定性信息,这对未来孕产妇保健干预措施的设计很重要。