Fryer R M, Segreti J, Banfor P N, Widomski D L, Backes B J, Lin C W, Ballaron S J, Cox B F, Trevillyan J M, Reinhart G A, von Geldern T W
Department of Integrative Pharmacology, Global Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6119, USA.
Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;153(5):947-55. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707641. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
Inhibition of bradykinin metabolizing enzymes (BMEs) can cause acute angioedema, as demonstrated in a recent clinical trial in patients administered the antihypertensive, omapatrilat. However, the relative contribution of specific BMEs to this effect is unclear and confounded by the lack of a predictive pre-clinical model of angioedema.
Rats were instrumented to record blood pressure and heart rate; inhibitors were infused for 35 min and bradykinin was infused during the last 5 min to elicit hypotension, as a functional marker of circulating bradykinin and relative angioedema risk.
In the presence of omapatrilat bradykinin produced dose-dependent hypotension, an effect abolished by B(2) blockade. In the presence of lisinopril (ACE inhibitor), but not candoxatril (NEP inhibitor) or apstatin (APP inhibitor), bradykinin also elicited hypotension. Lisinopril-mediated hypotension was unchanged with concomitant blockade of NEP or NEP/DPPIV (candoxatril+A-899301). However, hypotension was enhanced upon concomitant blockade of APP and further intensified in the presence of NEP inhibition to values not different from omapatrilat alone.
We demonstrated that bradykinin is degraded in vivo with an enzyme rank-efficacy of ACE>APP>>NEP or DPPIV. These results suggest the effects of omapatrilat are mediated by inhibition of three BMEs, ACE/APP/NEP. However, dual inhibition of ACE/NEP or ACE/NEP/DPPIV elicits no increased risk of angioedema compared to ACE inhibition alone. Thus, novel BME inhibitors must display no activity against APP to avoid angioedema risk due to high prevalence of ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
缓激肽代谢酶(BMEs)的抑制可导致急性血管性水肿,最近一项针对服用抗高血压药物奥美沙坦酯的患者的临床试验已证实这一点。然而,特定BMEs对这种效应的相对贡献尚不清楚,且由于缺乏血管性水肿的预测性临床前模型而变得复杂。
对大鼠进行仪器安装以记录血压和心率;抑制剂输注35分钟,在最后5分钟输注缓激肽以引发低血压,作为循环缓激肽和相对血管性水肿风险的功能标志物。
在存在奥美沙坦酯的情况下,缓激肽产生剂量依赖性低血压,这种效应可被B₂受体阻断消除。在存在赖诺普利(一种ACE抑制剂)的情况下,但在坎多沙坦(一种NEP抑制剂)或阿普他汀(一种APP抑制剂)不存在时,缓激肽也会引发低血压。赖诺普利介导的低血压在同时阻断NEP或NEP/DPPIV(坎多沙坦+A-899301)时无变化。然而,在同时阻断APP时低血压增强,并且在存在NEP抑制的情况下进一步加剧至与单独使用奥美沙坦酯时无差异的值。
我们证明缓激肽在体内以ACE>APP>>NEP或DPPIV的酶效能等级被降解。这些结果表明奥美沙坦酯的作用是由对三种BMEs,即ACE/APP/NEP的抑制介导的。然而,与单独抑制ACE相比,双重抑制ACE/NEP或ACE/NEP/DPPIV不会引发血管性水肿风险增加。因此,新型BME抑制剂必须对APP无活性,以避免由于糖尿病和心血管疾病患者中ACE抑制剂治疗的高流行率而导致血管性水肿风险。