Suppr超能文献

二叶式主动脉瓣综合征中的主动脉弹性与大小

Aortic elasticity and size in bicuspid aortic valve syndrome.

作者信息

Nistri Stefano, Grande-Allen Jane, Noale Marianna, Basso Cristina, Siviero Paola, Maggi Stefania, Crepaldi Gaetano, Thiene Gaetano

机构信息

Cardiology Service-CMSR Veneto Medica, Via Vicenza, 204, Altavilla Vicentina (VI), 36077 Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2008 Feb;29(4):472-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm528. Epub 2007 Dec 20.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the relation between aortic elastic properties and size in bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

127 BAV outpatients (121 males; age 23 +/- 10 years) with no or mild valvular impairment, were recruited with 114 control subjects comparable for age, gender, and body size. Aortic distensibility (DIS) and stiffness index (SI) were derived by M-mode evaluation of the aortic root together with blood pressure measured by cuff sphygmomanometer. BAVs vs. controls had increased aortic diameter (P < 0.0001), higher systolic (P = 0.02) and pulse (P = 0.04) pressures. DIS was lower in BAVs than in controls (4.71 +/- 3.67 vs. 7.44 +/- 3.94 10(-6) cm(2)dyne(-1), respectively; P < 0.0001) and SI was greater in BAVs (7.21 +/- 4.93 vs. 3.57 +/- 1.88, respectively; P < 0.0001). Definite impairment in aortic elasticity was present in 53 (42%) BAVs. Both DIS and SI were related (P < 0.0001) to aortic size in BAVs and controls. After adjusting for aortic size and blood pressure, the regression relations between SI and aortic diameter of BAVs were significantly different from controls (P = 0.0052).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal aortic elasticity is a common finding in BAVs with no or mild aortic valve impairment. However, impaired aortic stiffness is not due to aortic dilation. Simple assessment of aortic size may thus fail to identify early abnormal load bearing characteristics of the aortic wall in BAVs.

摘要

目的

研究二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)中主动脉弹性特性与大小之间的关系。

方法与结果

招募了127例无或轻度瓣膜损害的BAV门诊患者(121例男性;年龄23±10岁),并选取了114例年龄、性别和体型与之匹配的对照者。通过对主动脉根部进行M型评估以及使用袖带血压计测量血压来得出主动脉扩张性(DIS)和硬度指数(SI)。与对照组相比,BAV患者的主动脉直径增大(P<0.0001),收缩压(P=0.02)和脉压(P=0.04)更高。BAV患者的DIS低于对照组(分别为4.71±3.67与7.44±3.94 10⁻⁶ cm²dyne⁻¹;P<0.0001),而BAV患者的SI更高(分别为7.21±4.93与3.57±1.88;P<0.0001)。53例(42%)BAV患者存在明确的主动脉弹性损害。在BAV患者和对照组中,DIS和SI均与主动脉大小相关(P<0.0001)。在对主动脉大小和血压进行校正后,BAV患者SI与主动脉直径之间的回归关系与对照组有显著差异(P=0.0052)。

结论

在无或轻度主动脉瓣损害的BAV患者中,主动脉弹性异常是常见表现。然而,主动脉硬度受损并非由主动脉扩张所致。因此简单评估主动脉大小可能无法识别BAV患者主动脉壁早期异常的负荷特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验