Yip J L Y, Foster P J, Gilbert C E, Uranchimeg D, Bassanhuu J, Lee P S, Khaw P T, Johnson G J, Nolan W
International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;92(1):30-3. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.123471.
Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) accounts for nearly 50% of global glaucoma blindness. There are currently no public health strategies to deal with this problem. Screening and prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects (PACS) with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) may form a feasible population-level intervention. However, more information about the natural history of PACS is required before such an approach could be considered.
Six hundred and forty-four participants aged 50 years with a central anterior chamber depth (cACD) of <2.53 mm underwent a full slit-lamp examination in 1999. Of these, 160 participants diagnosed as having occludable angles by gonioscopy (ISGEO classification) were excluded from all further analysis, leaving 484 for follow-up. Six years later, 95/484 (19.6%) had died. A total of 201 of 389 participants traced (51.7%) were re-examined. The potential risk factors for the development of an occludable angle were assessed using the chi squared test, t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
At follow-up, 41 participants (20.4%, 95% CI: 14.8 to 25.7) were diagnosed as having incident PACS. Narrower angles, identified by grading of limbal chamber depth and gonioscopy at baseline, were strongly associated with incident occludable angles (p = 0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). There was weak evidence of an association with change in cACD (p = 0.05), and no evidence of an association with age, gender, and baseline cACD for the development of occludable angles.
Narrower angles as determined by limbal chamber depth grading and gonioscopy at baseline were the main risk factors identified for the development of occludable angles.
原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)导致了全球近50%的青光眼致盲病例。目前尚无应对这一问题的公共卫生策略。对原发性闭角型可疑患者(PACS)进行激光周边虹膜切开术(LPI)筛查和预防性治疗可能构成一种可行的群体水平干预措施。然而,在考虑采用这种方法之前,需要更多关于PACS自然病史的信息。
1999年,644名年龄≥50岁、中央前房深度(cACD)<2.53mm的参与者接受了全面的裂隙灯检查。其中,160名经前房角镜检查(ISGEO分类)诊断为具有可闭角的参与者被排除在所有进一步分析之外,剩余484名进行随访。6年后,95/484(19.6%)的参与者死亡。在追踪到的389名参与者中,共有201名(51.7%)接受了重新检查。采用卡方检验、t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验评估发生可闭角的潜在风险因素。
随访时,41名参与者(20.4%,95%CI:14.8至25.7)被诊断为发生了新发PACS。基线时通过角膜缘前房深度分级和前房角镜检查确定的房角越窄,与发生可闭角的相关性越强(分别为p = 0.01和p<0.01)。有微弱证据表明与cACD变化有关(p = 0.05),没有证据表明年龄、性别和基线cACD与发生可闭角有关。
基线时通过角膜缘前房深度分级和前房角镜检查确定的较窄房角是发生可闭角的主要风险因素。