Suppr超能文献

具有不同属性偏好信息形式的多属性群决策

Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes.

作者信息

Xu Zeshui

机构信息

Antai School of Economic and Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200052, China.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007 Dec;37(6):1500-11. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2007.904832.

Abstract

Interval utility values, interval fuzzy preference relations, and interval multiplicative preference relations are three common uncertain-preference formats used by decision-makers to provide their preference information in the process of decision making under fuzziness. This paper is devoted in investigating multiple-attribute group-decision-making problems where the attribute values are not precisely known but the value ranges can be obtained, and the decision-makers provide their preference information over attributes by three different uncertain-preference formats i.e., 1) interval utility values; 2) interval fuzzy preference relations; and 3) interval multiplicative preference relations. We first utilize some functions to normalize the uncertain decision matrix and then transform it into an expected decision matrix. We establish a goal-programming model to integrate the expected decision matrix and all three different uncertain-preference formats from which the attribute weights and the overall attribute values of alternatives can be obtained. Then, we use the derived overall attribute values to get the ranking of the given alternatives and to select the best one(s). The model not only can reflect both the subjective considerations of all decision-makers and the objective information but also can avoid losing and distorting the given objective and subjective decision information in the process of information integration. Furthermore, we establish some models to solve the multiple-attribute group-decision-making problems with three different preference formats: 1) utility values; 2) fuzzy preference relations; and 3) multiplicative preference relations. Finally, we illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the developed models with two practical examples.

摘要

区间效用值、区间模糊偏好关系和区间乘法偏好关系是决策者在模糊性决策过程中用于提供偏好信息的三种常见不确定偏好形式。本文致力于研究多属性群体决策问题,其中属性值并非精确已知,但可以获得其取值范围,并且决策者通过三种不同的不确定偏好形式,即:1)区间效用值;2)区间模糊偏好关系;3)区间乘法偏好关系,来提供他们对属性的偏好信息。我们首先利用一些函数对不确定决策矩阵进行规范化,然后将其转化为期望决策矩阵。我们建立一个目标规划模型来整合期望决策矩阵以及所有三种不同的不确定偏好形式,从中可以获得属性权重和备选方案的综合属性值。然后,我们使用导出的综合属性值来对给定的备选方案进行排序,并选出最佳方案。该模型不仅能够反映所有决策者的主观考虑和客观信息,而且能够避免在信息整合过程中丢失和扭曲给定的客观和主观决策信息。此外,我们建立了一些模型来解决具有三种不同偏好形式的多属性群体决策问题:1)效用值;2)模糊偏好关系;3)乘法偏好关系。最后,我们通过两个实际例子说明了所开发模型的适用性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007 Dec;37(6):1500-11. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2007.904832.
2
MAGDM linear-programming models with distinct uncertain preference structures.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008 Oct;38(5):1356-70. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.925752.
3
An Approach to Determining Attribute Weights Based on Integrating Preference Information on Attributes with Decision Matrix.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;2018:4864517. doi: 10.1155/2018/4864517. eCollection 2018.
4
An approach to solve group-decision-making problems with ordinal interval numbers.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2010 Oct;40(5):1413-23. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2039477. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
5
TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014 Aug;44(8):1283-94. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2282037. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
7
Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007 Feb;37(1):176-89. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2006.875872.
8
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(4):664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040664.
9
Linguistic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making with Risk Preferences and Its Use in Low-Carbon Tourism Destination Selection.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 17;14(9):1078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091078.
10
A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2005 Apr;35(2):184-96. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2004.842248.

引用本文的文献

1
Hesitant bi-fuzzy multi-attribute information fusion with expert reliability.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14334. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99236-w.
2
An Approach to Determining Attribute Weights Based on Integrating Preference Information on Attributes with Decision Matrix.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;2018:4864517. doi: 10.1155/2018/4864517. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验