Gray Len C, Bernabei Roberto, Berg Katherine, Finne-Soveri Harriet, Fries Brant E, Hirdes John P, Jónsson Pálmi V, Morris John N, Steel Knight, Ariño-Blasco Sergio
Academic Unit in Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Mar;56(3):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01590.x. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
To examine the frequency distributions and interrater reliability of individual items of the interRAI Acute Care instrument.
Observational study of a representative sample of older inpatients; duplicate assessments conducted on a subsample by independent assessors to examine interrater reliability.
Acute medical, acute geriatric and orthopedic units in 13 hospitals in nine countries.
Five hundred thirty-three patients aged 70 and older (mean age 82.4, range 70-102) with an anticipated stay of 48 hours or longer of whom 161 received duplicate assessments.
Sixty-two clinical items across 11 domains. Premorbid (3-day observation period before onset of the acute illness) and admission (the first 24 hours of hospital stay) assessments were conducted.
The frequency of deficits exceeded 30% for most items, ranging from 1% for physically abusive behavior to 86% for the need for support in activities of daily living after discharge. Common deficits were in cognitive skills for daily decision-making (38% premorbid, 54% at admission), personal hygiene (37%, 65%), and walking (39%, 71%). Interrater reliability was substantial in the premorbid period (average kappa=0.61) and admission period (average kappa=0.66). Of the 69 items tested, less than moderate agreement (kappa<0.4) was recorded for six (9%), moderate agreement (kappa=0.41-0.6) for 14 (20%), substantial agreement (kappa=0.61-0.8) for 40 (58%), and almost perfect agreement (kappa>0.8) for nine (13%).
Initial assessment of the psychometric properties of the interRAI Acute Care instrument provided evidence that item selection and interrater reliability are appropriate for clinical application. Further studies are required to examine the validity of embedded scales, diagnostic algorithms, and clinical protocols.
研究相互关系入院急性护理工具各单项的频率分布及评估者间信度。
对老年住院患者代表性样本进行观察性研究;由独立评估者对一个子样本进行重复评估以检验评估者间信度。
九个国家13所医院的急性内科、急性老年科和骨科病房。
533名70岁及以上患者(平均年龄82.4岁,范围70 - 102岁),预计住院时间48小时或更长,其中161名接受了重复评估。
11个领域的62项临床指标。进行病前(急性疾病发作前3天观察期)和入院(住院的前24小时)评估。
大多数指标的缺陷频率超过30%,范围从身体虐待行为的1%到出院后日常生活活动需要支持的86%。常见缺陷在于日常决策的认知技能(病前38%,入院时54%)、个人卫生(37%,65%)和行走(39%,71%)。评估者间信度在病前期(平均kappa = 0.61)和入院期(平均kappa = 0.66)较高。在测试的69项中,六项(9%)记录为低度一致性(kappa < 0.4),14项(20%)为中度一致性(kappa = 0.41 - 0.6),40项(58%)为高度一致性(kappa = 0.61 - 0.8),九项(13%)为几乎完全一致性(kappa > 0.8)。
对相互关系入院急性护理工具心理测量特性的初步评估表明,指标选择和评估者间信度适用于临床应用。需要进一步研究以检验嵌入式量表、诊断算法和临床方案的有效性。