Shigli Kamal, Angadi Gangadhar Shivappa, Hegde Pradnya
Department of Prosthodontics, Modern Dental College, Indore, India.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jan;99(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60011-6.
Occlusal disharmony due to processing can cause discomfort to the patient.
The purpose of this investigation was to identify whether refinement in occlusion was correlated with patient comfort and the number of postinsertion visits.
Maxillary and mandibular complete dentures were fabricated for 30 subjects who were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 subjects using a lottery: Group LCRO, the control group, received both laboratory and clinical remount procedures along with occlusal corrections; Group LRO subjects received only laboratory remount with occlusal corrections; and Group OOC subjects underwent routine procedures in complete denture construction without remount corrections and only occlusal corrections where required, intraorally. A pilot study was conducted to identify the feasibility of a close-ended questionnaire designed by the investigator and containing 5 questions regarding the comfort, pain, masticatory ability, swallowing, and occlusal contacts of maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. The evaluation was performed following the subject's use of the dentures for 7 days. All 30 subjects were examined for tissue irritation at this time. The evaluation was conducted by a single examiner who was unaware of the groups to which the subjects belonged. An analysis of statistical difference between the treatment groups for the number of postinsertion visits, comfort, pain during mastication, swallowing, and areas of tissue irritation during use of complete dentures was assessed using the chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test (alpha =.05).
The results indicated that remount procedures and occlusal corrections significantly reduced the number of postinsertion visits (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<.001). There was less pain during mastication in group LCRO compared to the other groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P=.0399). Group LCRO subjects also reported less incidence of tissue irritation compared to group LRO and group OOC (chi2=18.26, P<.001)
The combination of laboratory and clinical remount procedures with occlusal corrections enhanced patient comfort, compared to the other groups in which either one or both of the procedures were not performed.
加工导致的咬合不协调会给患者带来不适。
本研究的目的是确定咬合的优化是否与患者舒适度及义齿戴入后复诊次数相关。
为30名受试者制作上颌和下颌全口义齿,通过抽签将其随机分为3组,每组10名受试者:LCRO组为对照组,接受实验室和临床重衬程序以及咬合调整;LRO组受试者仅接受带有咬合调整的实验室重衬;OOC组受试者在全口义齿制作过程中接受常规程序,不进行重衬调整,仅在需要时进行口内咬合调整。进行一项初步研究以确定研究者设计的包含5个关于上颌和下颌全口义齿舒适度、疼痛、咀嚼能力、吞咽及咬合接触问题的封闭式问卷的可行性。在受试者使用义齿7天后进行评估。此时对所有30名受试者进行组织刺激性检查。评估由一名不了解受试者所属组别的单一检查者进行。使用卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验(α = 0.05)评估治疗组之间在义齿戴入后复诊次数、舒适度、咀嚼时疼痛、吞咽及使用全口义齿期间组织刺激区域方面的统计学差异。
结果表明,重衬程序和咬合调整显著减少了义齿戴入后的复诊次数(Kruskal-Wallis检验,P < 0.001)。与其他组相比,LCRO组咀嚼时疼痛较少(Kruskal-Wallis检验,P = 0.0399)。与LRO组和OOC组相比,LCRO组受试者报告的组织刺激发生率也较低(χ² = 18.26,P < 0.001)
与未进行其中一项或两项程序的其他组相比,实验室和临床重衬程序与咬合调整相结合可提高患者舒适度。