Williams Derfel Pari, Hughes Peter J, Fisher Anthony C, Doherty Patrick
Orthopaedic Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, England.
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jan;24(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.10.005.
The purpose of this study was to investigate heat application to arthroscopic knots as a method of improving knot security.
Heat treatment was assessed on 4 suture materials--Ethibond (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), PDS (Ethicon), Orthocord (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA), and FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL)--tied by use of the Duncan loop, compared with untreated controls. A hand-tied surgeon's knot with Ethibond was included as the gold standard. Knots were tied around a plastic rod immersed in a saline solution-filled water bath at 37 degrees C, with heat treatment performed by use of the Mitek VAPR 3 electrosurgical unit and VAPR S(90) electrode (DePuy Mitek), applied directly to the knot body. Loops were subjected to a 5-N preload, followed by loading to clinical failure (>3 mm of displacement) and ultimate (breaking) failure by use of a tensile tester.
Load to ultimate failure was significantly higher in the FiberWire 1-second heat treatment arm (26.0% increase, 234.25 +/- 62.34 N, P < .03), Orthocord 1-second heat treatment arm (55.6% increase, 204.72 +/- 78.47 N, P < .03), and Orthocord 5-second heat treatment arm (69.2% increase, 222.58 +/- 56.57 N, P < .001) than in controls. Load to clinical failure was significantly higher in the Orthocord 10-second heat treatment arm (34.7% increase, 78.58 +/- 13.88 N, P < .0001) when compared with controls. The FiberWire 5- and 10-second heat treatment arms showed lower load to clinical and ultimate failure (P < .001). Ethibond, Orthocord, and FiberWire showed higher load to clinical failure than PDS (P < .0001). Ethibond and Orthocord knots were more likely to fail through knot slippage after heat treatment compared with controls (P < .01).
Heat treatment resulted in greater knot security when combined with Orthocord and FiberWire suture materials. Heat-treated Ethibond and Orthocord knots were more likely to fail through suture breakage than knot slippage.
This study presents a simple and novel technique of improving knot security in the arthroscopic repair. The effects of heat were extremely well tolerated in the Orthocord and FiberWire groups, making this technique particularly suitable for clinical use.
本研究旨在探讨对关节镜下打结处进行加热作为一种提高结安全性的方法。
对4种缝合材料——爱惜邦缝线(强生公司,新泽西州萨默维尔)、聚对二氧环己酮缝线(强生公司)、Orthocord缝线(德普伊米泰克公司,马萨诸塞州雷纳姆)和FiberWire缝线( Arthrex公司,佛罗里达州那不勒斯)——使用邓肯环打结,并与未处理的对照组进行比较,评估热处理效果。将用爱惜邦缝线手工打的外科结作为金标准。结打在一根浸于37℃盐溶液填充水浴中的塑料棒上,使用米泰克VAPR 3电外科装置和VAPR S(90)电极(德普伊米泰克公司)直接对结体进行热处理。对环施加5N的预负荷,然后使用拉伸试验机加载至临床失败(位移>3mm)和最终(断裂)失败。
FiberWire缝线1秒热处理组(增加26.0%,234.25±62.34N,P<.03)、Orthocord缝线1秒热处理组(增加55.6%,204.72±78.47N,P<.03)和Orthocord缝线5秒热处理组(增加69.2%,222.58±56.57N,P<.001)的最终破坏负荷显著高于对照组。与对照组相比,Orthocord缝线10秒热处理组的临床失败负荷显著更高(增加34.7%,78.58±13.88N,P<.0001)。FiberWire缝线5秒和10秒热处理组的临床和最终失败负荷较低(P<.001)。爱惜邦缝线、Orthocord缝线和FiberWire缝线的临床失败负荷高于聚对二氧环己酮缝线(P<.0001)。与对照组相比,热处理后爱惜邦缝线和Orthocord缝线的结更易因结滑动而失败(P<.01)。
热处理与Orthocord缝线和FiberWire缝线材料结合时可提高结的安全性。热处理后的爱惜邦缝线和Orthocord缝线的结更易因缝线断裂而非结滑动而失败。
本研究提出了一种简单新颖的提高关节镜修复中结安全性的技术。Orthocord缝线和FiberWire缝线组对热效应的耐受性非常好,使该技术特别适合临床应用。