1991 - 2005年《应用行为分析杂志》中针对儿童的校本干预措施的治疗完整性
Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the journal of applied behavior analysis 1991-2005.
作者信息
McIntyre Laura Lee, Gresham Frank M, DiGennaro Florence D, Reed Derek D
机构信息
Department of Psychology, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):659-72. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.659-672.
Abstract
We reviewed all school-based experimental studies with individuals 0 to 18 years published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) between 1991 and 2005. A total of 142 articles (152 studies) that met review criteria were included. Nearly all (95%) of these experiments provided an operational definition of the independent variable, but only 30% of the studies provided treatment integrity data. Nearly half of studies (45%) were judged to be at high risk for treatment inaccuracies. Treatment integrity data were more likely to be included in studies that used teachers, multiple treatment agents, or both. Although there was a substantial increase in reporting operational definitions of independent variables, results suggest that there was only a modest improvement in reported integrity over the past 30 years of JABA studies. Recommendations for research and practice are discussed.
摘要
我们回顾了1991年至2005年间发表在《应用行为分析杂志》（JABA）上的所有针对0至18岁个体的校本实验研究。总共纳入了142篇符合审查标准的文章（152项研究）。这些实验中几乎所有（95%）都提供了自变量的操作定义，但只有30%的研究提供了治疗完整性数据。近一半的研究（45%）被判定存在治疗不准确的高风险。治疗完整性数据更有可能包含在使用教师、多种治疗人员或两者兼有的研究中。尽管在报告自变量的操作定义方面有大幅增加，但结果表明，在过去30年的JABA研究中，报告的完整性仅略有改善。文中讨论了对研究和实践的建议。
相似文献
1
Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the journal of applied behavior analysis 1991-2005.1991 - 2005年《应用行为分析杂志》中针对儿童的校本干预措施的治疗完整性
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):659-72. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.659-672.
2
Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children.针对儿童的应用行为分析中的治疗完整性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):257-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-257.
3
Translating multiple assessment techniques into an intervention selection model for classrooms.将多种评估技术转化为课堂干预选择模型。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Winter;36(4):563-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-563.
4
Evaluating an integrated support model for increasing treatment plan implementation following consultation in schools.评估一种综合支持模式，以提高学校咨询后治疗计划的实施率。
Sch Psychol Q. 2017 Dec;32(4):525-538. doi: 10.1037/spq0000195. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis.行为分析中自变量的完整性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):477-92. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477.
6
A group contingency program to improve the behavior of elementary school students in a cafeteria.一项旨在改善小学生在自助餐厅行为的群体应急计划。
Behav Modif. 2008 Jan;32(1):121-32. doi: 10.1177/0145445507308577.
7
Functional analysis in public schools: a summary of 90 functional analyses.公立学校的功能性分析：90 项功能性分析的总结。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):807-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-807.
8
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Schools: A Tutorial.学校中的正向行为干预与支持：教程
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Jan 28;50(1):1-15. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0037.
9
Effects of verbal and graphic performance feedback on behavior support plan implementation in a public elementary school.言语和图形绩效反馈对一所公立小学行为支持计划实施的影响。
Behav Modif. 2007 Jul;31(4):454-65. doi: 10.1177/0145445506297583.
10
Scripted sequences of teacher interaction. A versatile, low-impact procedure for increasing appropriate behavior in a nursery school.
Behav Modif. 1997 Jul;21(3):308-23. doi: 10.1177/01454455970213003.
引用本文的文献
1
Procedural Fidelity Reporting in from 2007-2021.2007年至2021年期间的程序保真度报告。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2023 Nov 27;40(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s40616-023-00197-w. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Verbal Behavior Analysis of Teaching Story Recall to Children with Autism: A Replication and Extension.针对自闭症儿童教学故事回忆的言语行为分析：一项复制与扩展研究。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2023 Mar 24;39(1):118-145. doi: 10.1007/s40616-023-00183-2. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Comparing Multiple Methods to Measure Procedural Fidelity of Discrete-trial Instruction.比较多种测量离散式试验教学程序保真度的方法。
Educ Treat Children. 2023 May 24:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s43494-023-00094-w.
4
Multiple Schedules Facilitate Rapid Noncontingent Reinforcement Schedule Thinning.多种时间表有助于快速进行非连续性强化时间表的稀疏化。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Aug 23;16(1):185-193. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00709-5. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Planning Positive Reinforcement Cycles in Behavior Intervention Plans.在行为干预计划中规划积极强化循环。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Feb 4;15(3):924-937. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00663-8. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Interobserver agreement and procedural fidelity: An odd asymmetry.观察者间一致性和程序保真度：一种奇怪的不对称性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):78-85. doi: 10.1002/jaba.961. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
7
The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Instrument (School Version): Development and Initial Psychometrics of a New Interdisciplinary Scale.循证实践（EBP）工具（学校版）：一种新型跨学科量表的开发与初步心理测量学研究
Contemp Sch Psychol. 2022 Jul 15:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s40688-022-00424-6.
8
When Treatment Adherence Matters: Interactions Among Treatment Adherence, Instructional Quality, and Student Characteristics on Reading Outcomes.当治疗依从性至关重要时：治疗依从性、教学质量和学生特征对阅读成果的相互作用。
Read Res Q. 2022 Apr-Jun;57(2):753-774. doi: 10.1002/rrq.442. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Treatment Integrity Reporting in 2008-2019.2008 - 2019年治疗完整性报告
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 May 3;15(2):443-453. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00573-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Teaching Future School Personnel to Train Parents to Implement Explicit Instruction Interventions.教导未来的学校工作人员培训家长实施明确的教学干预措施。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jul 12;14(3):856-872. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00612-5. eCollection 2021 Sep.
本文引用的文献
1
A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers' treatment implementation integrity and students' inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms.特殊教育课堂中绩效反馈程序对教师治疗实施完整性和学生不当行为的影响比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):447-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-447.
2
The effects of varying levels of treatment integrity on child compliance during treatment with a three-step prompting procedure.在采用三步提示程序进行治疗期间，不同水平的治疗完整性对儿童依从性的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Fall;39(3):369-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.144-05.
3
A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.《应用行为分析杂志》中报告的观察性数据收集和可靠性程序综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):97-101. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-97.
4
Methodological and assessment considerations in evaluating reinforcement programs in applied settings.在评估应用环境中的强化计划时的方法学和评估考虑因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):517-31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-517.
5
Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.应用行为分析的一些当前维度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.
6
Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.提高健康行为改变研究中的治疗保真度：美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟的最佳实践与建议
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443.
7
Increasing intervention implementation in general education following consultation: a comparison of two follow-up strategies.咨询后普通教育中干预措施实施情况的增加：两种后续策略的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):271-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-271.
8
Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children.针对儿童的应用行为分析中的治疗完整性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):257-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-257.
9
Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: strength, integrity, and effectiveness.成功治疗方法的选择与维持中的关键因素：强度、完整性和有效性。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Apr;49(2):156-67. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.49.2.156.
10
The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis.行为分析中自变量的完整性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):477-92. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477.
Zotero 插件