Struck Torsten H, Fisse Frauke
FB05 Biology/Chemistry, AG Zoology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Apr;25(4):728-36. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn019. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
Nemertea and Platyhelminthes have traditionally been grouped together because they possess a so-called acoelomate organization, but lateral vessels and rhynchocoel of nemerteans have been regarded as coelomic cavities. Additionally, both taxa show spiral cleavage patterns prompting the placement of Nemertea as sister to coelomate Protostomia, that is, either to Neotrochozoa (Mollusca and Annelida) or to Teloblastica (Neotrochozoa plus Arthropoda). Some workers maintain a sister group relationship of Nemertea and Platyhelminthes as Parenchymia because of an assumed homology of Götte's and Müller's larvae of polyclad Platyhelminthes and the pilidium larvae of heteronemerteans. So far, molecular data were only able to significantly reject a sister group relationship to Teloblastica. Although phylogenomic data are available for Platyhelminthes, Annelida, Mollusca, and Arthropoda, they are lacking for Nemertea. Herein, we present the first analysis specifically addressing nemertean phylogenetic position using phylogenomic data. More specifically, we collected expressed sequence tag data from Lineus viridis (O.F. Müller, 1774) and combined it with available data to produce a data set of 9,377 amino acid positions from 60 ribosomal proteins. Maximum likelihood analyses and Bayesian inferences place Nemertea in a clade together with Annelida and Mollusca. Furthermore, hypothesis testing significantly rejected a sister group relationship to either Platyhelminthes or Teloblastica. The Coelomata hypothesis, which groups coelomate taxa together to the exclusion of acoelomate and pseudocoelomate taxa, is not congruent with our results. Thus, the supposed acoelomate organization evolved independently in Nemertea and Platyhelminthes. In Nemertea, evolution of acoely is most likely due to a secondary reduction of the coelom as it is found in certain species of Mollusca and Annelida. Though looking very similar, the Götte's and Müller's larvae of polyclad Platyhelminthes are not homologous to the pilidium larvae of heteronemerteans. Finally, the convergent evolution of segmentation in Annelida and Arthropoda is further substantiated.
传统上,纽形动物门和扁形动物门被归为一类,因为它们具有所谓的无体腔结构,但纽形动物的侧血管和吻腔被视为体腔。此外,这两个类群都显示出螺旋卵裂模式,这促使将纽形动物门置于真体腔原口动物的姐妹群位置,即要么与新担轮动物(软体动物门和环节动物门),要么与端细胞动物(新担轮动物加上节肢动物门)。一些研究者认为纽形动物门和扁形动物门作为实质动物存在姐妹群关系,因为假定多肠目扁形动物的戈特幼虫和米勒幼虫与异纽类的帽状幼虫具有同源性。到目前为止,分子数据仅能显著排除与端细胞动物的姐妹群关系。尽管已有扁形动物门、环节动物门、软体动物门和节肢动物门的系统发育基因组数据,但纽形动物门的数据仍缺失。在此,我们展示了首次使用系统发育基因组数据专门探讨纽形动物系统发育位置的分析。更具体地说,我们从绿纽虫(O.F. 米勒,1774年)收集了表达序列标签数据,并将其与现有数据相结合,生成了一个由60种核糖体蛋白组成的包含9377个氨基酸位点的数据集。最大似然分析和贝叶斯推断将纽形动物门与环节动物门和软体动物门归为一个进化枝。此外,假设检验显著排除了与扁形动物门或端细胞动物的姐妹群关系。将真体腔类群归为一类而排除无体腔类和假体腔类群的真体腔假说与我们的结果不一致。因此,假定的无体腔结构在纽形动物门和扁形动物门中是独立进化的。在纽形动物门中,无肠现象的进化很可能是由于体腔的二次退化,就像在某些软体动物和环节动物物种中发现的那样。尽管看起来非常相似,但多肠目扁形动物的戈特幼虫和米勒幼虫与异纽类动物的帽状幼虫并非同源。最后,环节动物门和节肢动物门中体节的趋同进化得到了进一步证实。