Suppr超能文献

任务限制掩盖了大猩猩解决陷阱桌任务的能力。

Task constraints mask great apes' ability to solve the trap-table task.

作者信息

Girndt Antje, Meier T, Call J

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):54-62. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.54.

Abstract

Researchers have investigated animals' causal knowledge with a task requiring subjects to use a tool to bring a reward within reach whilst avoiding a trap. Previous studies have suggested limitations in the ability of several species to avoid traps in tubes or tables. However, certain features may have inflated task difficulty. We tested 20 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 7 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), 5 bonobos (Pan paniscus), and 5 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the trap-table--a task in which subjects have to pull one of two rakes prepositioned behind two rewards on a flat surface. One of the rewards is in front of a trap into which it will fall. We investigated the effect of trap type, tool type, the number of available tools, and reinforcement regime on performance. We replicated previous findings showing that apes failed to choose the correct rake above chance. However, when they could instead choose where to insert a single tool, around 80% of the apes solved the trap-table task in the first trial, revealing an important effect of task constraints on their performance.

摘要

研究人员通过一项任务来探究动物的因果知识,该任务要求受试者使用工具获取够得着的奖励,同时避开陷阱。此前的研究表明,几种物种在避开管子或桌子中的陷阱方面能力有限。然而,某些特征可能夸大了任务难度。我们对20只黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)、7只猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)、5只倭黑猩猩(倭黑猩猩属)和5只大猩猩(大猩猩属)进行了陷阱桌测试——在这项任务中,受试者必须在一个平面上拉动放置在两个奖励后面的两把耙子中的一把。其中一个奖励在一个陷阱前面,它会掉进陷阱里。我们研究了陷阱类型、工具类型、可用工具数量和强化机制对表现的影响。我们重复了之前的研究结果,即猿类未能以高于随机概率的水平选择正确的耙子。然而,当它们可以选择将单个工具插入何处时,约80%的猿类在第一次试验中就解决了陷阱桌任务,这揭示了任务限制对它们表现的重要影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验