Suppr超能文献

一项诊断一致性研究中额颞叶痴呆额部变异型与阿尔茨海默病的差异神经心理学模式

Differential neuropsychological patterns of frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease in a study of diagnostic concordance.

作者信息

Giovagnoli Anna R, Erbetta Alessandra, Reati Fabiola, Bugiani Orso

机构信息

Neuropsychology Laboratory, C. Besta National Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.023. Epub 2008 Jan 5.

Abstract

Although the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontal variant frontotemporal dementia (fvFTD) predict different cognitive patterns, many comparative neuropsychological studies showed no difference in the expected cognitive domains. Inconsistencies in diagnostic criteria, small cohorts of patients, and neuropsychological assessment may account for such findings. Moreover, discrepancies in memory and executive dysfunctions that are expected to distinguish AD and fvFTD may reflect the basic brain organization. Adhering to a strict concordance of clinical and neuroradiological criteria, we compared many patients with AD and fvFTD using a large neuropsychological battery. One hundred and thirty-nine patients with AD (n=89) or fvFTD (n=50) were retrospectively considered in order to verify the diagnostic congruence of clinical and neuroradiological aspects. On this basis, 117 patients with AD (n=77) or fvFTD (n=40) with similar duration and severity of dementia were selected. Ninety-one healthy subjects were also controlled. Mean scores in tests for abstract reasoning, planning, set shifting, initiative, verbal fluency, immediate and episodic memory, constructive, ideomotor and orofacial praxis, selective and divided attention, visuomotor coordination, and visual perception were evaluated. Separate analyses of variance and post hoc Bonferroni tests showed that, with respect to controls, both patient groups were significantly impaired in all neuropsychological tests. Compared to fvFTD patients, AD patients were significantly impaired in episodic memory, selective attention, visual perception, visuomotor coordination, and constructive praxis, whereas no differences were found in executive, intellective, and linguistic abilities between the two patient groups. Logistic regression analyses revealed that episodic memory significantly predicted the diagnosis of AD while no executive deficit was able to predict the diagnosis of fvFTD. To conclude, memory, attention, and visuoconstructive deficits may distinguish AD with respect to fvFTD, in accordance with the severe temporo-parietal-occipital degeneration characterizing AD, but no executive impairment is consistently able to identify a relative compromise in fvFTD. Executive functions impairments possibly reflect the altered spatial-temporal integration of the frontal lobes with different brain areas, which prevents a clear-cut cognitive-brain correlation.

摘要

尽管阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆额部变异型(fvFTD)的病理特征预示着不同的认知模式,但许多比较神经心理学研究表明,在预期的认知领域并无差异。诊断标准不一致、患者队列规模小以及神经心理学评估可能是造成此类结果的原因。此外,预期可区分AD和fvFTD的记忆和执行功能障碍差异可能反映了基本的脑组织情况。我们严格遵循临床和神经放射学标准,使用大量神经心理学测试对众多AD和fvFTD患者进行了比较。回顾性纳入了139例AD患者(n = 89)或fvFTD患者(n = 50),以验证临床和神经放射学方面的诊断一致性。在此基础上,选取了117例痴呆病程和严重程度相似的AD患者(n = 77)或fvFTD患者(n = 40)。还纳入了91名健康对照者。评估了抽象推理、计划、任务转换、主动性、语言流畅性、即刻和情景记忆、结构性、观念运动性和口面部运用、选择性和分散性注意力、视运动协调以及视觉感知测试中的平均得分。方差分析和事后Bonferroni检验结果显示,与对照组相比,两组患者在所有神经心理学测试中均有显著损伤。与fvFTD患者相比,AD患者在情景记忆、选择性注意力、视觉感知、视运动协调和结构性运用方面有显著损伤,而两组患者在执行、智力和语言能力方面未发现差异。逻辑回归分析表明,情景记忆显著预测AD诊断,而没有执行功能缺陷能够预测fvFTD诊断。总之,根据AD特征性的严重颞顶枕叶变性,记忆、注意力和视空间结构缺陷可能区分AD与fvFTD,但没有执行功能障碍能够始终如一地识别fvFTD中的相对损害。执行功能障碍可能反映了额叶与不同脑区时空整合的改变,这阻碍了明确清晰的认知 - 脑相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验