Catani Marco, Modini Claudio
Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Dec;54(80):2186-91.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is slowly taking its place also in an emergency setting, regardless of its initial unfortunate course when iatrogenic lesions during surgery, complications and conversion rate make the laparoscopic approach in acute cholecystitis a hazard. With the development of laparoscopic technique, the laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis becomes a reality, but its role in emergency is not yet defined. From December 1998 to December 2005, 133 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis were performed in our institution by the same surgeon. The mean age of patients was 48 years old, 21 were over seventy. In the series patients in ASA III and IV were included. All procedures were performed with the same technique, developed in the examined period, which represents a standardized downwards laparoscopic cholecystectomy, easy to reproduce and safe to perform. We report our surgical technique and our results. We did not report mortality, and there was very low morbidity. Only one patient was converted, giving an extremely low conversion rate of 0.7%. The average operating time was 52 min (range 17-70 min). Analyzing the operating time and the time between the onset of symptoms to surgery, we found that these two variables seem to be alike with a linear relationship; we found that the best timing for surgery is within 60 hr from the onset of symptoms. The latter analysis is reported. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, when performed with an adequate technique and as early as possible represents a safe procedure to treat acute cholecystitis in an emergency setting. The technique described, considering the results, lack of iatrogenic lesions and acceptable operating time, represents a standardized surgical strategy to approach acute cholecystitis (AC) in a safe, effective and reproducible manner.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术在急诊情况下也正逐渐占据一席之地,尽管其最初的发展并不顺利,手术中的医源性损伤、并发症以及中转开腹率使得腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆囊炎存在风险。随着腹腔镜技术的发展,腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎成为现实,但其在急诊中的作用尚未明确。1998年12月至2005年12月,同一外科医生在我们机构连续为133例急性胆囊炎患者实施了腹腔镜胆囊切除术。患者的平均年龄为48岁,其中21例年龄超过70岁。该系列纳入了ASA III级和IV级的患者。所有手术均采用在研究期间发展起来的相同技术,这是一种标准化的低位腹腔镜胆囊切除术,易于重复且操作安全。我们报告我们的手术技术和结果。我们未报告死亡病例,发病率也极低。仅1例患者中转开腹,中转率极低,为0.7%。平均手术时间为52分钟(范围17 - 70分钟)。分析手术时间和症状出现至手术的时间,我们发现这两个变量似乎呈线性关系且相似;我们发现手术的最佳时机是在症状出现后的60小时内。现将后者的分析报告如下。当采用适当技术并尽早进行时,腹腔镜胆囊切除术是在急诊情况下治疗急性胆囊炎的一种安全手术。考虑到结果、医源性损伤的缺乏以及可接受的手术时间,所描述的技术代表了一种以安全、有效且可重复的方式处理急性胆囊炎(AC)的标准化手术策略。