Suppr超能文献

这是真的吗?我们能赢吗?值得去做吗?管理创新投资组合中的风险与回报。

Is it real? Can we win? Is it worth doing? Managing risk and reward in an innovation portfolio.

作者信息

Day George S

机构信息

Mack Center for Technological Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Dec;85(12):110-20, 146.

Abstract

Minor innovations make up most of a company's development portfolio, on average, but they never generate the growth companies seek. The solution, says Day--the Geoffrey T. Boisi Professor of Marketing and a codirector of the Mack Center for Technological Innovation at Wharton--is for companies to undertake a systematic, disciplined review of their innovation portfolios and increase the number of major innovations at an acceptable level of risk. Two tools can help them do this. The first, called the risk matrix, graphically reveals the distribution of risk across a company's entire innovation portfolio. The matrix allows companies to estimate each project's probability of success or failure, based on how big a stretch it is for the firm to undertake. The less familiar the product or technology and the intended market, the higher the risk. The second tool, dubbed the R-W-W (real-win-worth it) screen, allows companies to evaluate the risks and potential of individual projects by answering six fundamental questions about each one: Is the market real? Explores customers' needs, their willingness to buy, and the size of the potential market. Is the product real? Looks at the feasibility of producing the innovation. Can the product be competitive? and Can our company be competitive? Investigate how well suited the company's resources and management are to compete in the marketplace with the product. Will the product be profitable at an acceptable risk? Explores the financial analysis needed to assess an innovation's commercial viability. Last, Does launching the product make strategic sense? examines the project's fit with company strategy and whether management supports it.

摘要

平均而言,小创新构成了公司发展组合的大部分,但它们从未带来公司所追求的增长。沃顿商学院营销学教授兼麦克技术创新中心联合主任戴表示,解决方案是公司对其创新组合进行系统、严谨的审查,并在可接受的风险水平上增加重大创新的数量。有两种工具可以帮助他们做到这一点。第一种称为风险矩阵,它以图形方式揭示了公司整个创新组合中的风险分布。该矩阵使公司能够根据开展项目对公司而言的难度,估计每个项目成功或失败的概率。产品或技术以及目标市场越不熟悉,风险就越高。第二种工具称为R-W-W(真实-获胜-值得)筛选法,它通过回答关于每个项目的六个基本问题,让公司评估单个项目的风险和潜力:市场是否真实?探究客户需求、他们的购买意愿以及潜在市场的规模。产品是否真实?考察生产该创新产品的可行性。产品能否具有竞争力?以及我们公司能否具有竞争力?调查公司的资源和管理在与该产品在市场上竞争时的适配程度。产品在可接受的风险水平下是否会盈利?探究评估创新商业可行性所需的财务分析。最后,推出该产品是否具有战略意义?考察该项目与公司战略的契合度以及管理层是否支持它。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验