Ebersbach Georg, Edler Daniela, Kaufhold Olaf, Wissel Joerg
Movement Disorders Clinic, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.031.
To compare the effects of whole body vibration (WBV) and conventional physiotherapy (PT) on levodopa-resistant disturbances of balance and gait in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD).
Randomized controlled rater-blinded trial comparing 2 active interventions, final follow-up assessment 4 weeks after termination of active intervention.
Specialized referral center, hospitalized care.
Patients with PD and dopa-resistant imbalance on stable dopamine replacement medication (N=27) were randomized (intent-to-treat population) to receive WBV (n=13) or conventional PT (controls, n=14). Twenty-one patients (per protocol population) completed follow-up (14 men, 7 women; mean age, 73.8 y; age range, 62-84 y; mean disease duration, 7.2 y; mean dopa-equivalent dose, 768 mg/d).
Subjects were randomized to receive 30 sessions (two 15-min sessions a day, 5 days a week) of either WBV on an oscillating platform or conventional balance training including exercises on a tilt board. Twenty-one subjects (10 with WBV, 11 controls) were available for follow-up 4 weeks after treatment termination.
The primary measure was Tinetti Balance Scale score. Secondary clinical ratings included stand-walk-sit test, walking velocity, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (section III motor examination) score, performance in the pull test, and dynamic posturography.
The Tinetti score improved from 9.3 to 12.8 points in the WBV group and from 8.3 to 11.7 in the controls. All secondary measures, except posturography, likewise improved at follow-up compared with baseline in both groups. Quantitative dynamic posturography only improved in patients with WBV (1937-1467 mm) whereas there was no significant change in controls (1832-2030 mm).
Equilibrium and gait improved in patients with PD receiving conventional WBV or conventional PT in the setting of a comprehensive rehabilitation program. There was no conclusive evidence for superior efficacy of WBV compared with conventional balance training.
比较全身振动(WBV)与传统物理治疗(PT)对特发性帕金森病(PD)中左旋多巴抵抗性平衡和步态障碍的影响。
随机对照、评估者盲法试验,比较两种主动干预措施,在主动干预结束后4周进行最终随访评估。
专业转诊中心,住院治疗。
患有PD且在稳定的多巴胺替代药物治疗下存在多巴抵抗性失衡的患者(N = 27)被随机分组(意向性治疗人群),接受WBV治疗(n = 13)或传统PT治疗(对照组,n = 14)。21名患者(符合方案人群)完成了随访(14名男性,7名女性;平均年龄73.8岁;年龄范围62 - 84岁;平均病程7.2年;平均多巴等效剂量768 mg/d)。
受试者被随机分配接受30次治疗(每天两次15分钟治疗,每周5天),要么在振动平台上进行WBV治疗,要么进行包括在倾斜板上锻炼的传统平衡训练。21名受试者(10名接受WBV治疗,11名对照组)在治疗终止后4周可进行随访。
主要指标是Tinetti平衡量表评分。次要临床评估包括站立 - 行走 - 坐下测试、步行速度、统一帕金森病评定量表(第三部分运动检查)评分、拉拽试验表现以及动态姿势描记法。
WBV组的Tinetti评分从9.3分提高到12.8分,对照组从8.3分提高到11.7分。与基线相比,两组在随访时除姿势描记法外的所有次要指标同样有所改善。定量动态姿势描记法仅在接受WBV治疗的患者中有所改善(从1937 - 1467毫米),而对照组无显著变化(从1832 - 2030毫米)。
在综合康复计划中,接受传统WBV或传统PT治疗的PD患者的平衡和步态得到改善。没有确凿证据表明WBV比传统平衡训练具有更优疗效。