Suppr超能文献

使用牙科美学指数对治疗前缺牙患者进行的初步评估:它与其他常用指数相比如何?

A preliminary evaluation of pre-treatment hypodontia patients using the Dental Aesthetic Index: how does it compare with other commonly used indices?

作者信息

Shelton A T, Hobson R S, Slater D

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Newcastle-upon-tyne Dental Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2008 Jun;30(3):244-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm104. Epub 2008 Feb 27.

Abstract

There is currently no specific occlusal index related to hypodontia and there is a paucity of published literature on this subject. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship, if any, between the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index, the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON), and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) score and the severity of hypodontia. All new patients attending the Newcastle Dental Hospital hypodontia clinic between February 2002 and March 2003 were included in the study. Of the 60 patients, two were excluded as the models were unavailable and one because they were predominantly in the primary dentition, making scoring impractical. The patient casts were scored with respect to PAR, ICON, and DAI. The mean patient age at presentation was 12 years, with a standard deviation of 1.89 and a range of 9-16 years, and a female to male ratio of 1.1:1. A significant positive correlation, using Kendall tau b, was found between the number of missing teeth, excluding third molars, and the DAI score (tau = 0.215, P = 0.027). There was no significant positive correlation between PAR (tau = -0.186, P = 0.056) and ICON (tau = 0.017, P = 0.861) score and the number of missing teeth. The results of this investigation indicate that further research is required in order to assess if the DAI could be used to determine whether or not to refer hypodontia patients for specialist advice.

摘要

目前尚无与牙列缺损相关的特定咬合指数,且关于该主题的已发表文献较少。本研究的目的是确定同伴评估评分(PAR)指数、复杂性、结果与需求指数(ICON)以及牙齿美学指数(DAI)评分与牙列缺损严重程度之间是否存在关系。2002年2月至2003年3月期间在纽卡斯尔牙科医院牙列缺损诊所就诊的所有新患者均纳入本研究。60名患者中,两名因模型不可用被排除,一名因主要处于乳牙列阶段,使得评分不切实际而被排除。对患者的模型进行PAR、ICON和DAI评分。患者就诊时的平均年龄为12岁,标准差为1.89,年龄范围为9至16岁,男女比例为1.1:1。使用肯德尔tau b检验发现,排除第三磨牙后的缺失牙数量与DAI评分之间存在显著正相关(tau = 0.215,P = 0.027)。PAR评分(tau = -0.186,P = 0.056)和ICON评分(tau = 0.017,P = 0.861)与缺失牙数量之间无显著正相关。本调查结果表明,需要进一步研究以评估DAI是否可用于确定是否将牙列缺损患者转诊以获取专科建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验