Ozcan Mutlu, Nijhuis Henk, Valandro Luiz Felipe
Clinical Dental Biomaterials, Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dent Mater J. 2008 Jan;27(1):99-104.
This study evaluated the effect of chairside and laboratory types of surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia ceramic after thermocycling. Disk-shaped (diameter: 10 mm, thickness: 2 mm) Y-TZP ceramics (Lava, 3M ESPE) were used (N=40) and finished with wet 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper. Specimens were randomly divided into four experimental groups according to the following surface conditioning methods (n=10 per group): Group 1--Chairside airborne particle abrasion with 50-microm Al2O2 + Alloy Primer (Kuraray); Group 2--Airborne particle abrasion with 50-microm Al2O3 + Cesead II Opaque Primer (Kuraray); Group 3--Airborne particle abrasion with 50-microm A12O3 + Silano-Pen + silane coupling agent (Bredent); Group 4--Laboratory tribochemical silica coating (110-microm Al2O3 + 110-microm SiOx) (Rocatec) + silane coupling agent (ESPE-Sil). Adhesive cement, Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray), was bonded incrementally to the ceramic surfaces using polyethylene molds (diameter: 3.6 mm, height: 5 mm). All specimens were thermocycled (5 and 55 degrees C, 6,000 cycles) and subjected to shear bond strength test (1 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA, alpha=0.05), whereby no significant differences were found among the four groups (8.43+/-1.3, 8.98+/-3.6, 12.02+/-6.7, and 8.23+/-3.8 MPa) (p=0.1357). Therefore, the performance of chairside conditioning methods used for zirconia was on par with the laboratory alternative tested.
本研究评估了椅旁和实验室类型的表面处理方法对热循环后含MDP功能单体的双固化树脂水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷之间黏附力的影响。使用了圆盘状(直径:10 mm,厚度:2 mm)的Y-TZP陶瓷(Lava,3M ESPE)(N = 40),并用湿的1200目碳化硅砂纸进行打磨。根据以下表面处理方法将样本随机分为四个实验组(每组n = 10):第1组——使用50微米Al2O2进行椅旁空气颗粒研磨+合金底漆(可乐丽);第2组——使用50微米Al2O3进行空气颗粒研磨+Cesead II不透明底漆(可乐丽);第3组——使用50微米Al2O3进行空气颗粒研磨+硅烷笔+硅烷偶联剂(Bredent);第4组——实验室摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层(110微米Al2O3 + 110微米SiOx)(Rocatec)+硅烷偶联剂(ESPE-Sil)。使用聚乙烯模具(直径:3.6 mm,高度:5 mm)将黏结性水门汀Panavia F 2.0(可乐丽)逐步粘结到陶瓷表面。所有样本均进行热循环(5和55摄氏度,6000次循环)并进行剪切粘结强度测试(1 mm/分钟)。对数据进行统计学分析(单因素方差分析,α = 0.05),结果发现四组之间无显著差异(8.43±1.3、8.98±3.6、12.02±6.7和8.23±3.8 MPa)(p = 0.1357)。因此,用于氧化锆的椅旁处理方法的性能与所测试的实验室替代方法相当。