Suppr超能文献

用于矫正拇外翻的新月形截骨术与Mau截骨术的比较。

A comparison of the crescentic and Mau osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus.

作者信息

Hyer Christopher F, Glover Jason P, Berlet Gregory C, Philbin Terrence M, Lee Thomas H

机构信息

Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;47(2):103-11. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.12.004.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We retrospectively compared crescentic and Mau osteotomies used to treat a total of 39 cases of hallux abductovalgus. Follow-up was possible in 10 of the crescentic cases (mean 228 days) and 24 of the Mau cases (mean 245 days). Preoperatively, the mean first intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles were 17.5 degrees and 35.4 degrees , respectively, in the crescentic group; and 16.6 degrees and 31.3 degrees , respectively, in the Mau group. Postoperatively, these same radiographic angles were 11.7 degrees and 18.9 degrees , respectively, in the crescentic group; and 9.8 degrees and 12.9 degrees , respectively, in the Mau group, and these differences were not statistically significant. Complications included metatarsus primus elevatus (crescentic 7, Mau 2), lesser metatarsal transfer lesion (crescentic 1, Mau 0), nonunion (crescentic 5, Mau 1), revisional surgery (crescentic 0, Mau 1), and transarticular hardware (crescentic 3, Mau 0). The incidence of complications in the crescentic group was 60%, whereas that in the Mau group was 37.5%; this difference was not statistically significant (P = .276). Analysis by the type of complication revealed statistically significant differences between the crescentic and Mau groups in regard to metatarsus primus elevatus (70% versus 8.3%, P = .001), transarticular hardware (30% versus 0%, P = .02), and nonunion (50% versus 4.2%, P = .006). In conclusion, crescentic and Mau osteotomies satisfactorily corrected the first intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles in patients that fit our inclusion criteria, although the incidence of postoperative metatarsus primus elevatus, delayed union, and transarticular hardware placement, was higher in the crescentic osteotomy group.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

摘要

未标注

我们回顾性比较了用于治疗总共39例拇外翻的新月形截骨术和Mau截骨术。新月形截骨术组的10例患者(平均随访228天)以及Mau截骨术组的24例患者(平均随访245天)可进行随访。术前,新月形截骨术组的第一跖骨间角和拇外翻角平均分别为17.5度和35.4度;Mau截骨术组分别为16.6度和31.3度。术后,新月形截骨术组相同的影像学角度分别为11.7度和18.9度;Mau截骨术组分别为9.8度和12.9度,这些差异无统计学意义。并发症包括第一跖骨抬高(新月形截骨术组7例,Mau截骨术组2例)、小跖骨转移损伤(新月形截骨术组1例,Mau截骨术组0例)、骨不连(新月形截骨术组5例,Mau截骨术组1例)、翻修手术(新月形截骨术组0例,Mau截骨术组1例)以及关节内固定物(新月形截骨术组3例,Mau截骨术组0例)。新月形截骨术组的并发症发生率为60%,而Mau截骨术组为37.5%;这一差异无统计学意义(P = 0.276)。按并发症类型分析显示,新月形截骨术组和Mau截骨术组在第一跖骨抬高(70%对8.3%,P = 0.001)、关节内固定物(30%对0%,P = 0.02)以及骨不连(50%对4.2%,P = 0.006)方面存在统计学显著差异。总之,新月形截骨术和Mau截骨术在符合我们纳入标准的患者中均能令人满意地矫正第一跖骨间角和拇外翻角,尽管新月形截骨术组术后第一跖骨抬高、骨延迟愈合以及关节内固定物置入的发生率更高。

临床证据水平

2级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验