Rose Louise, Nelson Sioban, Johnston Linda, Presneill Jeffrey J
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(8):1035-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02129.x.
To provide an analysis of the scope of nursing practice and inter-professional role responsibility for ventilatory decision-making in Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) intensive care units (ICU).
Currently, little empirical data describe nurses' role in decision-making for ventilation and its weaning. Delineation of roles and responsibilities for ventilatory practices vary according to unit structure, staffing and skill-mix, patient case-mix and unit leadership models.
Self-administered questionnaire sent to nurse managers of eligible ICUs within ANZ. Results. Survey responses were available from 54/180 ICUs. The majority (71%) of responding ICUs were located within metropolitan areas and categorised as a tertiary level ICU (50%). The mean number of nurses employed per ICU bed was 4.7 in Australia and 4.2 in NZ, with 69% (IQR: 47-80%) of nurses holding a postgraduate specialty qualification. All units reported a 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio for ventilated patients with 71% reporting a 1:2 nurse-to-patient ratio for non- ventilated patients. Key ventilator decisions, including assessment of weaning and extubation readiness, were reported as predominantly made by nurses and doctors in collaboration. Overall, nurses described high levels of autonomy and influence in ventilator decision-making. Decisions to change ventilator settings, including FiO(2) (91%, 95% CI: 80-97), ventilator rate (65%, 95% CI: 51-77) and pressure support adjustment (57%, 95% CI: 43-71), were made independently by nurses.
The results of this survey suggest, within the ANZ context, nurses participate actively in ventilation and weaning decisions. In addition, the results support an association between the education profile and skill-mix of nurses and the level of collaborative practice in ICU. Relevance to clinical practice. Mechanical ventilation may result in significant complications if not applied appropriately. Collaborative practice that encourages nursing input into decision-making may improve patient outcomes and reduce complications.
分析澳大利亚和新西兰(澳新)重症监护病房(ICU)中护理实践的范围以及通气决策中的跨专业角色责任。
目前,很少有实证数据描述护士在通气及撤机决策中的作用。通气实践的角色和责任划分因科室结构、人员配备和技能组合、患者病例组合以及科室领导模式而异。
向澳新地区符合条件的ICU的护士长发放自填式问卷。结果。180个ICU中有54个回复了调查问卷。大多数(71%)回复的ICU位于大都市地区,且被归类为三级ICU(50%)。澳大利亚每个ICU床位的平均护士人数为4.7人,新西兰为4.2人,69%(四分位间距:47 - 80%)的护士拥有研究生专业资格。所有科室报告称,接受通气治疗的患者护士与患者比例为1:1,71%的科室报告称,未接受通气治疗的患者护士与患者比例为1:2。包括撤机和拔管准备评估在内的关键通气决策,据报告主要由护士和医生共同做出。总体而言,护士表示在通气决策中具有较高的自主权和影响力。护士独立做出改变通气设置的决策,包括调整吸氧浓度(FiO₂)(91%,95%置信区间:80 - 97)、通气频率(65%,95%置信区间:51 - 77)和压力支持(57%,95%置信区间:43 - 71)。
本次调查结果表明,在澳新地区,护士积极参与通气和撤机决策。此外,结果支持护士的教育背景和技能组合与ICU中的协作实践水平之间存在关联。与临床实践的相关性。如果机械通气应用不当,可能会导致严重并发症。鼓励护士参与决策的协作实践可能会改善患者预后并减少并发症。