Hammell Karen Whalley
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Oxbow, Saskatchewan.
Can J Occup Ther. 2008 Feb;75(1):61-4. doi: 10.2182/cjot.07.007.
Although claiming that engagement in occupations influences well-being, the occupational therapy profession has largely failed to acknowledge and address the relationships between well-being, occupation, and human rights.
This paper supports the premise that the focus of occupational therapy should be on the right of all people to participate in meaningful occupations, and proposes allegiance to occupational rights: the right of all people to engage in meaningful occupations that contribute positively to their own well-being and the well-being of their communities.
The connection between well-being and human rights would be made explicit, occupational rights would be recognized as a political issue and the profession's confinement within health-care services would end. This commitment to occupational rights would bring our practice into line with our espoused belief in the relationship between occupation and well-being, and enable us to state, unequivocally, what occupational therapy contributes to humanity.
尽管声称从事职业活动会影响幸福感,但职业治疗专业在很大程度上未能认识到并解决幸福感、职业活动和人权之间的关系。
本文支持这样一个前提,即职业治疗的重点应是所有人参与有意义职业活动的权利,并提议效忠于职业权利:所有人从事对自身幸福和社区幸福有积极贡献的有意义职业活动的权利。
幸福感与人权之间的联系将变得明确,职业权利将被视为一个政治问题,该专业在医疗保健服务范围内的局限将结束。对职业权利的这一承诺将使我们的实践与我们所信奉的职业活动与幸福感之间的关系保持一致,并使我们能够明确说明职业治疗对人类的贡献。