Yan Lihan K, Zheng Gang, Li Zhaohai
Biostatistics Program, Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.
Ann Hum Genet. 2008 Jul;72(Pt 4):557-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00435.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
In family-based association studies, an optimal test statistic with asymptotic normal distribution is available when the underlying genetic model is known (e.g., recessive, additive, multiplicative, or dominant). In practice, however, genetic models for many complex diseases are usually unknown. Using a single test statistic optimal for one genetic model may lose substantial power when the model is mis-specified. When a family of genetic models is scientifically plausible, the maximum of several tests, each optimal for a specific genetic model, is robust against the model mis-specification. This robust test is preferred over a single optimal test. Recently, cost-effective group sequential approaches have been introduced to genetic studies. The group sequential approach allows interim analyses and has been applied to many test statistics, but not to the maximum statistic. When the group sequential method is applied, type I error should be controlled. We propose and compare several approaches of controlling type I error rates when group sequential analysis is conducted with the maximum test for family-based candidate-gene association studies. For a two-stage group sequential robust procedure with a single interim analysis, two critical values for the maximum tests are provided based on a given alpha spending function to control the desired overall type I error.
在基于家系的关联研究中,当潜在遗传模型已知时(例如隐性、加性、乘性或显性),可获得具有渐近正态分布的最优检验统计量。然而在实际中,许多复杂疾病的遗传模型通常是未知的。当模型设定错误时,使用对一种遗传模型最优的单一检验统计量可能会损失大量效能。当一系列遗传模型在科学上合理时,针对特定遗传模型各自最优的几种检验的最大值对模型设定错误具有稳健性。这种稳健检验优于单一最优检验。最近,经济有效的序贯分组方法已被引入遗传研究。序贯分组方法允许进行期中分析,并且已应用于许多检验统计量,但未应用于最大值统计量。当应用序贯分组方法时,应控制I型错误。我们提出并比较了在基于家系的候选基因关联研究中,对最大值检验进行序贯分组分析时控制I型错误率的几种方法。对于具有单次期中分析的两阶段序贯分组稳健程序,基于给定的α消耗函数提供了最大值检验的两个临界值,以控制期望的总体I型错误。