Suppr超能文献

ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者症状发作至入院时间:是否被过度强调或忽视?AMI-麦吉尔研究结果

Symptom-to-door time in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: overemphasized or overlooked? Results from the AMI-McGill study.

作者信息

Afilalo Jonathan, Piazza Nicolo, Tremblay Sonia, Soucy Nathalie, Huynh Thao

机构信息

Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2008 Mar;24(3):213-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70587-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ischemic time is a major determinant of infarct size in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Emphasis is placed on reducing the door-to-reperfusion therapy time component, whereas the symptom-to-door time is often overlooked.

OBJECTIVES

To correlate the symptom-to-door time with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)-McGill was a cohort study of consecutive patients with STEMI who presented to three adult university hospitals. Multivariate linear regression was performed to correlate the symptom-to-door time with postinfarction LVEF adjusted for reperfusion method, prior myocardial infarction and components of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score.

RESULTS

There were 188 patients, with a mean age of 66 years. On arrival to hospital, 23% of patients were in Killip class II to IV and 87% received reperfusion therapy (20% fibrinolytic therapy and 67% primary percutaneous coronary intervention). The median symptom-to-door time was 120 min (first quartile: 60 min, third quartile: 290 min) and the median door-to-reperfusion therapy time was 93 min (first quartile: 54 min, third quartile: 155 min). Three variables were independently correlated with LVEF in the study's regression model: symptom-to-door time (beta: -0.66, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.14; P=0.01), Killip class II to IV on arrival (beta: -6.43, 95% CI -11.87 to -0.99; P=0.02) and anterior territory of the infarction (beta: -5.86, 95% CI -10.55 to -1.18; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom-to-door time was negatively correlated with postinfarction LVEF in patients with STEMI. Strategies to shorten this delay, such as educating high-risk patients about the symptoms of AMI, should be considered.

摘要

背景

缺血时间是ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)梗死面积的主要决定因素。重点在于缩短门到再灌注治疗时间,而症状到门的时间常常被忽视。

目的

在STEMI患者中,将症状到门的时间与左心室射血分数(LVEF)进行关联。

方法

急性心肌梗死(AMI)-麦吉尔研究是一项针对连续就诊于三家成人大学医院的STEMI患者的队列研究。采用多变量线性回归分析,将症状到门的时间与梗死后期LVEF进行关联,并对再灌注方法、既往心肌梗死以及心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)风险评分的组成部分进行校正。

结果

共有188例患者,平均年龄66岁。入院时,23%的患者处于Killip分级II至IV级,87%的患者接受了再灌注治疗(20%接受纤溶治疗,67%接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)。症状到门的时间中位数为120分钟(第一四分位数:60分钟,第三四分位数:290分钟),门到再灌注治疗时间中位数为93分钟(第一四分位数:54分钟,第三四分位数:155分钟)。在该研究的回归模型中,有三个变量与LVEF独立相关:症状到门的时间(β:-0.66,95%置信区间-1.18至-0.14;P=0.01)、入院时Killip分级II至IV级(β:-6.43,95%置信区间-11.87至-0.99;P=0.02)以及梗死前壁区域(β:-5.86,95%置信区间-10.55至-1.18;P=0.02)。

结论

STEMI患者中,症状到门的时间与梗死后期LVEF呈负相关。应考虑采取缩短这一延迟的策略,如对高危患者进行急性心肌梗死症状的教育。

相似文献

3
Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 to 2002.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 3;47(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.071. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
10
Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the BLITZ study.
Eur Heart J. 2003 Sep;24(18):1616-29. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00278-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Significance of Time Between Balloon and Peak CK-MB in AMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI.
JACC Asia. 2025 May;5(5):650-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.013. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验