Larson Charles R, Altman Kenneth W, Liu Hanjun, Hain Timothy C
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):613-21. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1330-z. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of both kinesthetic and auditory feedback for control of voice fundamental frequency (F0). In the present study, a possible interaction between auditory feedback and kinesthetic feedback for control of voice F0 was tested by administering local anesthetic to the vocal folds in the presence of perturbations in voice pitch feedback. Responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback were larger when the vocal fold mucosa was anesthetized than during normal kinesthesia. A mathematical model incorporating a linear combination of kinesthesia and pitch feedback simulated the main aspects of our experimental results. This model indicates that a feasible explanation for the increase in response magnitude with vocal fold anesthesia is that the vocal motor system uses both pitch and kinesthesia to stabilize voice F0 shortly after a perturbation of voice pitch feedback has been perceived.
先前的研究已经证明了动觉反馈和听觉反馈对于控制语音基频(F0)的重要性。在本研究中,通过在语音音高反馈存在扰动的情况下对声带施用局部麻醉剂,测试了听觉反馈和动觉反馈之间对于控制语音F0的可能相互作用。当声带黏膜被麻醉时,对音高偏移语音反馈的反应比正常动觉期间更大。一个结合了动觉和音高反馈线性组合的数学模型模拟了我们实验结果的主要方面。该模型表明,声带麻醉后反应幅度增加的一个可行解释是,在察觉到语音音高反馈受到扰动后不久,语音运动系统利用音高和动觉来稳定语音F0。