Bhavsar Satyendra P, Reiner Eric J, Hayton Alan, Fletcher Rachael, MacPherson Karen
Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 125 Resources Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M9P 3V6.
Environ Int. 2008 Oct;34(7):915-21. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) are an essential part of the Toxic Equivalent (TEQ) concept and have evolved for dioxins/dioxin-like compounds over the last two and half decades. Therefore, it is difficult to compare past and current TEQs that are reported using different TEFs without explicitly mentioning underlying congener concentrations. Using what likely is the largest known dioxin/furan (PCDD/F) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyl (dl-PCB or DLP) fish database, here we present regression models that can facilitate conversion of a fish TEQ from an old to a newer TEF scheme. The results show that the mammalian PCDD/F-TEQ based on the latest TEF(WHO-05) is about 7.5% lower than that based on TEF(WHO-98). The mammalian DLP-TEQ(WHO-05) is on average 25-26% lower than almost identical DLP-TEQ(WHO-94) and DLP-TEQ(WHO-98). Total-TEQ(WHO-05) is on average 22% lower than Total-TEQ(WHO-98). According to the current toxicological standards for dioxins/furans, all previous major TEF schemes except TEF(Germany-85) and TEF(USEPA-87) were conservative (i.e., higher) in estimating TEQs. The major (> 75%) contribution to PCDD/F-TEQ(WHO-05) is from 2,3,7,8-TCDD (33%), 1,2,3,7,8-PCDD (26%), 2,3,7,8-TCDF (10%), and 2,3,4,7,8-PCDF (9%). The DLP-TEQ(WHO-05) is dominated by PCB-126 which on average contributes about 88%. The DLP-TEQ generally contribute > 70% of Total-TEQ. When reporting TEQs, we recommend that the underlying congener specific concentrations are presented, TEF scheme used is clearly stated, names of compounds included are explicitly expressed, and TEQs are identified accordingly (e.g., DLP-TEQ, PCDD/F-TEQ, Total-TEQ).
毒性当量因子(TEFs)是毒性当量(TEQ)概念的重要组成部分,在过去二十五年中已针对二噁英/类二噁英化合物不断演变。因此,如果没有明确提及相关同系物浓度,就很难比较过去和现在使用不同TEFs报告的TEQs。利用可能是已知最大的二噁英/呋喃(PCDD/F)和类二噁英多氯联苯(dl-PCB或DLP)鱼类数据库,我们在此展示了回归模型,该模型有助于将鱼类的TEQ从旧的TEF方案转换为新的方案。结果表明,基于最新TEF(WHO-05)的哺乳动物PCDD/F-TEQ比基于TEF(WHO-98)的低约7.5%。哺乳动物的DLP-TEQ(WHO-05)平均比几乎相同的DLP-TEQ(WHO-94)和DLP-TEQ(WHO-98)低25%-26%。总TEQ(WHO-05)平均比总TEQ(WHO-98)低22%。根据目前二噁英/呋喃的毒理学标准,除了TEF(德国-85)和TEF(美国环保署-87)外,所有以前的主要TEF方案在估计TEQs时都较为保守(即偏高)。对PCDD/F-TEQ(WHO-05)的主要(>75%)贡献来自2,3,7,8-TCDD(33%)、1,2,3,7,8-PCDD(26%)、2,3,7,8-TCDF(10%)和2,3,4,7,8-PCDF(9%)。DLP-TEQ(WHO-05)主要由PCB-126主导,其平均贡献约为88%。DLP-TEQ通常占总TEQ的>70%。在报告TEQs时,我们建议列出相关的同系物特定浓度,明确说明所使用的TEF方案,明确表达所包含化合物的名称,并相应地标识TEQs(例如,DLP-TEQ、PCDD/F-TEQ、总TEQ)。