Wolfstadt Jesse I, Gurwitz Jerry H, Field Terry S, Lee Monica, Kalkar Sunila, Wu Wei, Rochon Paula A
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):451-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0504-5.
Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) with clinical decision support (CDS) has been promoted as an effective strategy to prevent the development of a drug injury defined as an adverse drug event (ADE).
To systematically review studies evaluating the effects of CPOE with CDS on the development of an ADE as an outcome measure.
PUBMED versions of MEDLINE (from inception through March 2007) were searched to identify relevant studies. Reference lists of included studies were also searched.
We searched for original investigations, randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, and observational studies that evaluated the effect of CPOE with CDS on the rates of ADEs. The studies identified were assessed to determine the type of computer system used, drug categories being evaluated, types of ADEs measured, and clinical outcomes assessed.
Of the 543 citations identified, 10 studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies were grouped into categories based on their setting: hospital or ambulatory; no studies related to the long-term care setting were identified. CPOE with CDS contributed to a statistically significant (P < or = .05) decrease in ADEs in 5 (50.0%) of the 10 studies. Four studies (40.0%) reported a nonstatistically significant reduction in ADE rates, and 1 study (10.0%) demonstrated no change in ADE rates.
Few studies have measured the effect of CPOE with CDS on the rates of ADEs, and none were randomized controlled trials. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of CPOE with CDS across the various clinical settings.
具有临床决策支持(CDS)的计算机化医生医嘱录入(CPOE)已被推广为预防定义为药物不良事件(ADE)的药物伤害发生的有效策略。
系统评价评估具有CDS的CPOE对作为结局指标的ADE发生影响的研究。
检索MEDLINE的PUBMED版本(从创刊至2007年3月)以识别相关研究。还检索了纳入研究的参考文献列表。
我们检索了评估具有CDS的CPOE对ADE发生率影响的原始研究、随机和非随机临床试验以及观察性研究。对识别出的研究进行评估,以确定所使用的计算机系统类型、评估的药物类别、测量的ADE类型以及评估的临床结局。
在识别出的543条引文中,10项研究符合我们的纳入标准。这些研究根据其设置分为几类:医院或门诊;未识别出与长期护理设置相关的研究。在10项研究中的5项(50.0%)中,具有CDS的CPOE使ADE在统计学上显著降低(P≤0.05)。4项研究(40.0%)报告ADE发生率有非统计学意义的降低,1项研究(10.0%)表明ADE发生率无变化。
很少有研究测量具有CDS的CPOE对ADE发生率的影响,且没有一项是随机对照试验。需要进一步研究以评估具有CDS的CPOE在各种临床环境中的疗效。