Suppr超能文献

分离性或联合性隐斜能预测合适的棱镜吗?

Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?

作者信息

Otto Joanna M N, Kromeier Miriam, Bach Michael, Kommerell Guntram

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik, Killianstr. 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 May;246(5):631-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0798-3. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dissociated and associated phoria are measures of latent strabismus under artificial viewing conditions. We examined to what extent dissociated and associated phoria predict the "comfortable prism", i.e. the prism that appears most comfortable under natural viewing conditions.

METHODS

For associated phoria, a configuration resembling the Mallett test was employed: both eyes were presented with a fixation cross, surrounded by fusionable objects. Nonius lines served as monocular markers. For dissociated phoria, the left eye was presented with all the Mallett elements, while only a white spot was presented to the right eye. To determine the comfortable prism, all the Mallett elements, including the Nonius lines, were shown to both eyes. In each of the three tests, the observer had to adjust a pair of counterrotating prisms. To avoid any (possibly prejudiced) influence of the experimenter, the prismatic power was recorded with a potentiometer. Twenty non-strabismic subjects with a visual acuity of >or=1.0 in each eye were examined.

RESULTS

The range of the intertrial mean was for dissociated phoria from +9.3 eso to -5.9 cm/m exo, for associated phoria from +11.2 eso to -3.3 cm/m exo, and for the comfortable prism from +4.8 eso to -4.1 cm/m exo (cm/m = prism dioptre). In most observers, the phoria parameters differed greatly from the comfortable prism. On average, the phoria values were shifted about 2 cm/m towards the eso direction in relation to the comfortable prism (associated phoria not less than dissociated phoria).

CONCLUSIONS

The deviation of both, dissociated and associated phoria, from the comfortable prism suggests that the abnormal viewing conditions under which the phoria parameters are determined induce artefacts. Accordingly, the findings cast doubt on current textbook recommendations to use dissociated or associated phoria as a basis for therapeutic prisms. Rather, patients should be allowed to determine their comfortable prism under natural viewing conditions.

摘要

背景

分离性隐斜和融合性隐斜是在人工观察条件下对潜在斜视的测量方法。我们研究了分离性隐斜和融合性隐斜在多大程度上能预测“舒适棱镜”,即在自然观察条件下看起来最舒适的棱镜。

方法

对于融合性隐斜,采用了类似于马利特试验的配置:双眼均呈现一个注视十字,周围环绕着可融合的物体。游标线用作单眼标记。对于分离性隐斜,左眼呈现所有马利特元素,而右眼仅呈现一个白色点。为了确定舒适棱镜,向双眼展示所有马利特元素,包括游标线。在这三项测试中的每一项中,观察者都必须调整一对反向旋转的棱镜。为避免实验者的任何(可能有偏见的)影响,使用电位计记录棱镜度数。对20名非斜视受试者进行了检查,每只眼睛的视力均≥1.0。

结果

分离性隐斜的试验间平均值范围为内斜+9.3棱镜度至外斜-5.9棱镜度,融合性隐斜为内斜+11.2棱镜度至外斜-3.3棱镜度,舒适棱镜为内斜+4.8棱镜度至外斜-4.1棱镜度(棱镜度=棱镜屈光度)。在大多数观察者中,隐斜参数与舒适棱镜有很大差异。平均而言,隐斜值相对于舒适棱镜向内斜方向偏移约2棱镜度(融合性隐斜不少于分离性隐斜)。

结论

分离性隐斜和融合性隐斜与舒适棱镜的偏差表明,确定隐斜参数时的异常观察条件会产生假象。因此,这些发现对当前教科书建议以分离性或融合性隐斜为治疗棱镜的基础提出了质疑。相反,应该让患者在自然观察条件下确定他们的舒适棱镜。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/197b/2292470/11c03e469137/417_2008_798_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验