Bartley P C, Bogoev M, Larsen J, Philotheou A
Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
Diabet Med. 2008 Apr;25(4):442-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02407.x.
This 24-month, multi-national, open-label, parallel group trial investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of insulin detemir and Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin in combination with mealtime insulin aspart in patients with Type 1 diabetes using a treat-to-target concept.
Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to detemir (n = 331) or NPH (n = 166) groups. Basal insulin was initiated once daily (evening) and titrated individually based on self-measured plasma glucose (PG) levels, aiming for pre-breakfast and pre-dinner targets < or = 6.0 mmol/l. A second basal morning dose could be added according to pre-defined criteria.
After 24 months, superiority of glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was achieved with detemir compared to NPH (detemir 7.36%, NPH 7.58%, mean difference -0.22% points) [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.41 to -0.03%], with reductions of 0.94% and 0.72% points, respectively. Fasting PG (FPG(lab)) was also lower with detemir (detemir 8.35 mmol/l, NPH 9.43 mmol/l; P = 0.019). Twenty-two per cent of patients treated with detemir reached an HbA(1c) < or = 7.0% in the absence of confirmed hypoglycaemia during the last month of treatment vs. 13% on NPH (P = 0.019). Risk of major and nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 69% and 46% lower with detemir than with NPH (P < 0.001), respectively; patients treated with detemir gained less weight (detemir 1.7 kg, NPH 2.7 kg; P = 0.024). The overall safety profile was similar in the two groups and treatment with detemir did not result in any unexpected findings.
Long-term treatment with the insulin analogues detemir + aspart was superior to NPH + aspart in reducing HbA(1c), with added benefits of less major and nocturnal hypoglycaemia and less weight gain.
这项为期24个月的多国开放标签平行组试验,采用达标治疗理念,研究了地特胰岛素和中性精蛋白锌胰岛素联合餐时门冬胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病患者的长期疗效和安全性。
患者按2:1随机分为地特胰岛素组(n = 331)和中性精蛋白锌胰岛素组(n = 166)。基础胰岛素每日一次(晚上)起始给药,并根据自我测量的血浆葡萄糖(PG)水平进行个体化滴定,目标是早餐前和晚餐前血糖目标≤6.0 mmol/L。可根据预定义标准添加第二剂基础胰岛素晨剂。
24个月后,与中性精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,地特胰岛素使糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)更具优势(地特胰岛素7.36%,中性精蛋白锌胰岛素7.58%,平均差值-0.22个百分点)[95%置信区间(CI)-0.41至-0.03%],分别降低了0.94和0.72个百分点。地特胰岛素组的空腹血糖(实验室测量)也更低(地特胰岛素8.35 mmol/L,中性精蛋白锌胰岛素9.43 mmol/L;P = 0.019)。在治疗的最后一个月,22%接受地特胰岛素治疗的患者在未发生确诊低血糖的情况下HbA1c≤7.0%,而中性精蛋白锌胰岛素组为13%(P = 0.019)。地特胰岛素导致的严重和夜间低血糖风险分别比中性精蛋白锌胰岛素低69%和46%(P < 0.001);接受地特胰岛素治疗的患者体重增加较少(地特胰岛素组增加1.7 kg,中性精蛋白锌胰岛素组增加2.7 kg;P = 0.024)。两组的总体安全性相似,地特胰岛素治疗未产生任何意外发现。
胰岛素类似物地特胰岛素+门冬胰岛素的长期治疗在降低HbA1c方面优于中性精蛋白锌胰岛素+门冬胰岛素,还具有减少严重和夜间低血糖以及减轻体重增加的额外益处。