Sod Gary A, Mitchell Colin F, Hubert Jeremy D, Martin George S, Gill Marjorie S
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Vet Surg. 2008 Apr;37(3):289-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00379.x.
To compare monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a 5.5 mm broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate (5.5-LC-DCP) fixation with a 4.5 mm broad LC-DCP (4.5-LC-DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones.
In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation.
Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=18 pair).
MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (6 pairs each) for: (1) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing; (2) 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing; and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. The 8-hole, 5.5 mm broad LC-DCP (5.5-LC-DCP) was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. One 8-hole, 4.5 mm broad LC-DCP (4.5-LC-DCP) was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05.
Mean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load and failure bending moment under 4-point bending, single cycle to failure, of the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation were significantly greater (P<.024) than those of the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure for 4-point bending was significantly (P<.05) greater for the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation compared with the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation. Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load in torsion for the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation was not significantly different (P>.05) than those with the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation.
5.5-LC-DCP fixation was superior to 4.5-LC-DCP fixation in resisting the static overload forces under palmarodorsal 4-point bending. There was no significant difference between 5.5-LC-DCP fixation and 4.5-LC-DCP fixation in resisting static overload forces under torsion; however, the 5.5-LC-DCP offers significantly less stability (80% of that of the 4.5-LC-DCP) in cyclic fatigue testing.
The results of this in vitro study may provide information to aid in the selection of a biological plate for long bone fracture repair in horses.
比较5.5毫米宽的有限接触动力加压钢板(5.5-LC-DCP)固定与4.5毫米宽的有限接触动力加压钢板(4.5-LC-DCP)固定修复马第三掌骨(MC3)截骨的单调生物力学性能和疲劳寿命。
对成对的马尸体MC3进行体外生物力学测试,在骨干中部进行截骨,采用两种骨折固定方法之一进行稳定固定。
成年马尸体MC3骨(n = 18对)。
将MC3分为3个测试组(每组6对),分别进行:(1)4点弯曲单周期破坏试验;(2)4点弯曲循环疲劳试验;(3)扭转单周期破坏试验。将8孔、5.5毫米宽的有限接触动力加压钢板(5.5-LC-DCP)应用于每对中随机选择的一块骨的背侧表面。将一块8孔、4.5毫米宽的有限接触动力加压钢板(4.5-LC-DCP)背侧应用于每对中对侧的骨。钢板和螺钉采用标准的AO/ASIF技术应用。所有MC3骨均在骨干中部进行截骨。每组内使用配对t检验比较每种方法的平均测试变量值。显著性设定为P < 0.05。
在4点弯曲单周期破坏试验中,5.5-LC-DCP固定的平均屈服载荷、屈服弯矩、复合刚度、破坏载荷和破坏弯矩显著高于4.5-LC-DCP固定(P < 0.024)。4点弯曲的平均破坏循环次数,4.5-LC-DCP固定显著高于5.5-LC-DCP固定(P < 0.05)。5.5-LC-DCP固定在扭转时的平均屈服载荷、平均复合刚度和平均破坏载荷与4.5-LC-DCP固定相比无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
在抵抗掌背4点弯曲下的静态过载力方面,5.5-LC-DCP固定优于4.5-LC-DCP固定。在抵抗扭转下的静态过载力方面,5.5-LC-DCP固定与4.5-LC-DCP固定无显著差异;然而,在循环疲劳试验中,5.5-LC-DCP提供的稳定性显著较低(为4.5-LC-DCP的80%)。
这项体外研究的结果可能为帮助选择用于马长骨骨折修复的生物钢板提供信息。