Sawada Takahiro, Shite Junya, Garcia-Garcia Hector M, Shinke Toshiro, Watanabe Satoshi, Otake Hiromasa, Matsumoto Daisuke, Tanino Yusuke, Ogasawara Daisuke, Kawamori Hiroyuki, Kato Hiroki, Miyoshi Naoki, Yokoyama Mitsuhiro, Serruys Patrick W, Hirata Ken-ichi
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Eur Heart J. 2008 May;29(9):1136-46. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn132. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
To evaluate the feasibility of the combined use of virtual histology (VH)-intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting in vivo thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA).
In 56 patients with angina, 126 plaques identified by IVUS findings were analysed using both VH-IVUS and OCT. IVUS-derived TCFA was defined as an abundant necrotic core (>10% of the cross-sectional area) in contact with the lumen (NCCL) and %plaque-volume >40%. OCT-derived TCFA was defined as a fibrous cap thickness of <65 microm overlying a low-intensity area with an unclear border. Plaque meeting both TCFA criteria was defined as definite-TCFA. Sixty-one plaques were diagnosed as IVUS-derived TCFA and 36 plaques as OCT-derived TCFA. Twenty-eight plaques were diagnosed as definite-TCFA; the remaining 33 IVUS-derived TCFA had a non-thin-cap and eight OCT-derived TCFA had a non-NCCL (in discord with NCCL visualized by VH-IVUS, mainly due to misreading caused by dense calcium). Based on IVUS findings, definite-TCFA showed a larger plaque and vessel volume, %plaque-volume, higher vessel remodelling index, and greater angle occupied by the NCCL in the lumen circumference than non-thin-cap IVUS-derived TCFA. Conclusion Neither modality alone is sufficient for detecting TCFA. The combined use of OCT and VH-IVUS might be a feasible approach for evaluating TCFA.
评估联合应用虚拟组织学(VH)-血管内超声(IVUS)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在体内检测薄帽纤维粥样斑块(TCFA)的可行性。
对56例心绞痛患者中通过IVUS发现的126个斑块进行VH-IVUS和OCT分析。IVUS衍生的TCFA定义为与管腔接触的大量坏死核心(>横截面积的10%)且斑块体积百分比>40%。OCT衍生的TCFA定义为覆盖边界不清的低强度区域的纤维帽厚度<65微米。符合两种TCFA标准的斑块定义为确诊-TCFA。61个斑块被诊断为IVUS衍生的TCFA,36个斑块被诊断为OCT衍生的TCFA。28个斑块被诊断为确诊-TCFA;其余33个IVUS衍生的TCFA有非薄帽,8个OCT衍生的TCFA有非NCCL(与VH-IVUS显示的NCCL不一致,主要是由于致密钙导致的误读)。基于IVUS结果,确诊-TCFA与非薄帽IVUS衍生的TCFA相比,显示出更大的斑块和血管体积、斑块体积百分比、更高的血管重塑指数以及管腔圆周中NCCL占据的更大角度。结论单独使用任何一种方法都不足以检测TCFA。联合使用OCT和VH-IVUS可能是评估TCFA的一种可行方法。