Viera Anthony J, Cohen Lauren W, Mitchell C Madeline, Sloane Philip D
Department of Family Medicine and the Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Apr;10(4):280-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07530.x.
Using a survey of a cohort of primary care patients, the authors determined the proportion currently using home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and calculated odds ratios (ORs) of factors associated with such use. Overall, 530 questionnaires were received (80% response rate); 35.2% of respondents reported that their doctor had recommended HBPM (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.1-39.3), and 43.1% reported currently using HBPM (95% CI, 38.8-47.3). Compared with patients younger than 45 years, hypertensive patients older than 65 years were more likely to be using HBPM (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.20-5.33). Those with a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack were also more likely to use HBPM (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.00-4.24). Compared with patients with a level of hypertension knowledge <10th percentile, those with a knowledge level >90th percentile were more likely to use HBPM (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.08-3.56). The factor most strongly associated with use of HBPM was recalling a doctor's recommendation to do so (OR, 7.93; 95% CI, 4.96-12.7).
通过对一组初级保健患者进行调查,作者确定了目前使用家庭血压监测(HBPM)的比例,并计算了与此种使用相关的因素的比值比(OR)。总体而言,共收到530份问卷(回复率80%);35.2%的受访者表示其医生曾推荐过HBPM(95%置信区间[CI],31.1 - 39.3),43.1%的受访者表示目前正在使用HBPM(95%CI,38.8 - 47.3)。与45岁以下的患者相比,65岁以上的高血压患者更有可能使用HBPM(OR,2.53;95%CI,1.20 - 5.33)。有中风/短暂性脑缺血发作病史的患者也更有可能使用HBPM(OR,2.06;95%CI,1.00 - 4.24)。与高血压知识水平处于第10百分位数以下的患者相比,知识水平处于第90百分位数以上的患者更有可能使用HBPM(OR,1.96;95%CI,1.08 - 3.56)。与使用HBPM最密切相关的因素是回忆起医生的推荐(OR,7.93;95%CI,4.96 - 12.7)。