Tayce J, Acevedo P, Vicente J, Gortazar C
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC, (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ronda de Toledo s.n., Ciudad Real, Spain.
J Helminthol. 2008 Sep;82(3):255-61. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X08972473. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
Faecal surveys are commonly used as non-invasive means to evaluate population abundance of animals as well as comparable indexes of prevalence and intensity of diseases between populations, especially macroparasites. While faecal surveys are among one of the simplest means to perform these evaluations, they are time consuming and labour intensive. The present study evaluated 80 red deer (Cervus elaphus) faecal samples collected in two study sites for the presence and abundance of first-stage larvae of the nematode Elaphostrongylus cervi and established pools of samples for epidemiological analysis. The analysis of 20-30 individual samples would produce a reliable estimate of the 'true' prevalence, and the error of the smaller sample size only doubled that of the 80 reference samples. The analysis of 5 pools of 5 pellet groups each, or of 4 pools of 10 pellet groups each, provided a reliable estimation of the 'true' excretion abundance estimated by the analysis of all 80 samples. These pools comprise a cost-effective and dependable alternative for measuring and obtaining comparable abundances of parasitic faecal excretion stages in red deer populations, which is very valuable for epidemiological and ecological research as well as for management purposes.
粪便调查通常被用作评估动物种群数量以及种群间疾病流行率和感染强度可比指标的非侵入性方法,尤其是对于大型寄生虫。虽然粪便调查是进行这些评估的最简单方法之一,但它们既耗时又费力。本研究评估了在两个研究地点采集的80份马鹿粪便样本,以检测线虫鹿圆线虫第一期幼虫的存在情况和数量,并建立了用于流行病学分析的样本池。对20 - 30个个体样本进行分析将得出对“真实”流行率的可靠估计,较小样本量的误差仅为80个参考样本误差的两倍。对每组5个粪粒的5个样本池进行分析,或对每组10个粪粒的4个样本池进行分析,都能对通过分析所有80个样本估计出的“真实”排泄量进行可靠估计。这些样本池是一种经济高效且可靠的替代方法,可用于测量和获取马鹿种群中寄生性粪便排泄阶段的可比数量,这对于流行病学和生态学研究以及管理目的都非常有价值。