Tyson Jon E, Parikh Nehal A, Langer John, Green Charles, Higgins Rosemary D
Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1672-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073059.
Decisions regarding whether to administer intensive care to extremely premature infants are often based on gestational age alone. However, other factors also affect the prognosis for these patients.
We prospectively studied a cohort of 4446 infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation (determined on the basis of the best obstetrical estimate) in the Neonatal Research Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to relate risk factors assessable at or before birth to the likelihood of survival, survival without profound neurodevelopmental impairment, and survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at a corrected age of 18 to 22 months.
Among study infants, 3702 (83%) received intensive care in the form of mechanical ventilation. Among the 4192 study infants (94%) for whom outcomes were determined at 18 to 22 months, 49% died, 61% died or had profound impairment, and 73% died or had impairment. In multivariable analyses of infants who received intensive care, exposure to antenatal corticosteroids, female sex, singleton birth, and higher birth weight (per each 100-g increment) were each associated with reductions in the risk of death and the risk of death or profound or any neurodevelopmental impairment; these reductions were similar to those associated with a 1-week increase in gestational age. At the same estimated likelihood of a favorable outcome, girls were less likely than boys to receive intensive care. The outcomes for infants who underwent ventilation were better predicted with the use of the above factors than with use of gestational age alone.
The likelihood of a favorable outcome with intensive care can be better estimated by consideration of four factors in addition to gestational age: sex, exposure or nonexposure to antenatal corticosteroids, whether single or multiple birth, and birth weight. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00063063 [ClinicalTrials.gov] and NCT00009633 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
关于是否对极早产儿实施重症监护的决策通常仅基于胎龄。然而,其他因素也会影响这些患者的预后。
我们对美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络中4446例孕22至25周出生的婴儿(根据最佳产科估计确定)进行了前瞻性研究,以探讨出生时或出生前可评估的危险因素与18至22个月校正年龄时存活、无严重神经发育障碍存活以及无神经发育障碍存活的可能性之间的关系。
在研究婴儿中,3702例(83%)接受了机械通气形式的重症监护。在4192例(94%)于18至22个月时确定结局的研究婴儿中,49%死亡,61%死亡或有严重障碍,73%死亡或有障碍。在对接受重症监护的婴儿进行的多变量分析中,产前使用糖皮质激素、女性、单胎出生以及较高出生体重(每增加100克)均与死亡风险以及死亡或严重或任何神经发育障碍风险的降低相关;这些降低与胎龄增加1周相关的降低相似。在相同的有利结局估计可能性下,女孩比男孩接受重症监护的可能性更小。与仅使用胎龄相比,使用上述因素能更好地预测接受通气的婴儿的结局。
除胎龄外,考虑性别、是否产前使用糖皮质激素、单胎或多胎出生以及出生体重这四个因素,可以更好地估计重症监护获得有利结局的可能性。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00063063 [ClinicalTrials.gov]和NCT00009633 [ClinicalTrials.gov]。)