Neuhauser Linda, Kreps Gary L
School of Public Health, 50 University Hall MC 7360, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun;71(3):365-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.015.
This article provides an analysis of issues and empirical evidence related to literacy, cultural, and linguistic factors in online health and cancer communication, and recommendations to improve cancer communication for diverse audiences.
We examined English-language online literature and selected books and policy documents related to literacy, cultural, and linguistic factors in health and cancer communication.
Studies about literacy, cultural, and linguistic factors in online cancer communication for diverse audiences are limited, but have increased during the past 15 years. Empirical evidence and theoretical guidance describe the critical importance of these factors, significant unmet needs among low-literate, multicultural and non-English-speaking populations, and strategies to improve communication.
Overall, online cancer communication has not met the literacy, cultural, and linguistic needs of diverse populations. The literature offers valuable recommendations about enhancing research, practice, and policy for better cancer communication.
Practitioners should understand the strengths and weaknesses of online cancer communication for vulnerable groups, guide patients to better Websites, and supplement that information with oral and tailored communication.
本文分析了在线健康与癌症交流中与读写能力、文化和语言因素相关的问题及实证证据,并提出了针对不同受众改善癌症交流的建议。
我们查阅了与健康和癌症交流中的读写能力、文化和语言因素相关的英文在线文献、选定书籍及政策文件。
针对不同受众的在线癌症交流中有关读写能力、文化和语言因素的研究有限,但在过去15年中有所增加。实证证据和理论指导阐述了这些因素的至关重要性、低读写能力人群、多元文化人群及非英语人群中未得到满足的重大需求,以及改善交流的策略。
总体而言,在线癌症交流未能满足不同人群的读写能力、文化和语言需求。该文献为加强研究、实践和政策以实现更好的癌症交流提供了宝贵建议。
从业者应了解在线癌症交流对弱势群体的优缺点,引导患者访问更好的网站,并通过口头及个性化交流补充该信息。