Suppr超能文献

用于阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。

Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

作者信息

McNicol E D, Boyce D, Schumann R, Carr D B

机构信息

New England Medical Center, Pharmacy and Anesthesia, Box #420, 750 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OBD) is characterized by constipation, incomplete evacuation, bloating, and increased gastric reflux. OBD occurs both acutely and chronically, in multiple disease states, resulting in increased morbidity and reduced quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of traditional and peripherally active opioid antagonists versus conventional interventions for OBD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE in January 2007. Additional reports were identified from the reference lists of retrieved papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of mu-opioid antagonists for OBD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent review authors and included demographic variables, diagnoses, interventions, efficacy, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria and provided data on 2871 opioid antagonist-treated patients. The opioid antagonists investigated were alvimopan (nine studies), methylnaltrexone (six), naloxone (seven), and nalbuphine (one). Meta-analysis demonstrated that methylnaltrexone and alvimopan were better than placebo in reversing opioid-induced increased gastrointestinal transit time and constipation, and that alvimopan appears to be safe and efficacious in treating postoperative ileus. The incidence of adverse events with opioid antagonists was similar to placebo and generally reported as mild-to-moderate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient evidence exists for the safety or efficacy of naloxone or nalbuphine in the treatment of OBD. Long-term efficacy and safety of any of the opioid antagonists is unknown, as is the incidence or nature of rare adverse events. Alvimopan and methylnaltrexone both show promise in treating OBD, but further data will be required to fully assess their place in therapy.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍(OBD)的特征为便秘、排便不尽、腹胀及胃反流增加。OBD在多种疾病状态下均可急性或慢性发生,导致发病率增加及生活质量下降。

目的

比较传统及外周活性阿片类拮抗剂与常规干预措施治疗OBD的疗效及安全性。

检索策略

我们于2007年1月检索了MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库及EMBASE。从检索到的论文参考文献列表中识别出其他报告。

选择标准

纳入的研究需为随机对照试验,研究μ-阿片类拮抗剂治疗OBD的疗效。

数据收集与分析

由两名独立的综述作者提取数据,包括人口统计学变量、诊断、干预措施、疗效及不良事件。

主要结果

23项研究符合纳入标准,提供了2871例接受阿片类拮抗剂治疗患者的数据。所研究的阿片类拮抗剂有阿洛司琼(9项研究)、甲基纳曲酮(6项)、纳洛酮(7项)及纳布啡(1项)。荟萃分析表明,甲基纳曲酮和阿洛司琼在逆转阿片类药物引起的胃肠转运时间延长和便秘方面优于安慰剂,且阿洛司琼在治疗术后肠梗阻方面似乎安全有效。阿片类拮抗剂的不良事件发生率与安慰剂相似,一般报告为轻至中度。

作者结论

纳洛酮或纳布啡治疗OBD的安全性或疗效证据不足。任何阿片类拮抗剂的长期疗效和安全性均未知,罕见不良事件的发生率及性质也未知。阿洛司琼和甲基纳曲酮在治疗OBD方面均显示出前景,但需要更多数据来全面评估它们在治疗中的地位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验