Ensign Josephine, Ammerman Seth
Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2008 May;62(3):365-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04599.x.
This paper is a report of a study to document researcher, healthcare provider and programme administrators' experiences with ethical issues in research with homeless youths in North America.
While there are legal and ethical guidelines for research with adolescents and with vulnerable populations in general, there are no specific guidelines for the ethical conduct of research with homeless youths.
Using a web-based questionnaire, healthcare and social service providers, programme administrators and researchers working with homeless young people throughout the United States of America and Canada were surveyed in 2005. The survey group consisted of 120 individuals; a total of 72 individuals completed the survey. Survey questions included experiences with using incentives in research with homeless youths, consent and experiences with ethics review boards. Numerical data were analysed using frequencies and cross-tabulations. Text data were analysed qualitatively.
Researchers doing mental health and/or substance use research tended to use money as a research incentive, whereas healthcare providers and programme administrators tended to use non-monetary incentives. The majority of respondents reported using written consent for research from homeless youths, including minors. Respondents reporting difficulties with ethics review boards were mainly involved with intervention research.
Consensus is needed from a variety of stakeholders, including homeless youths and service providers, on use of various types of research incentives for different types of research, as well as use of consent for homeless youths who are minors.
本文报告一项研究,记录研究人员、医疗保健提供者和项目管理人员在北美针对无家可归青少年开展研究时遇到的伦理问题。
虽然针对青少年及一般弱势群体的研究有法律和伦理准则,但针对无家可归青少年的伦理研究尚无具体准则。
2005年,通过网络问卷对美国和加拿大各地与无家可归青少年打交道的医疗保健和社会服务提供者、项目管理人员及研究人员进行了调查。调查对象有120人,共72人完成了调查。调查问题包括在针对无家可归青少年的研究中使用激励措施的经历、同意问题以及伦理审查委员会的相关经历。对数值数据进行频率分析和交叉制表分析,对文本数据进行定性分析。
开展心理健康和/或药物使用研究的人员倾向于使用金钱作为研究激励措施,而医疗保健提供者和项目管理人员倾向于使用非金钱激励措施。大多数受访者报告称在针对包括未成年人在内的无家可归青少年的研究中采用书面同意。报告在伦理审查委员会方面遇到困难的受访者主要参与干预研究。
包括无家可归青少年和服务提供者在内的各类利益相关者需要就针对不同类型研究使用各类研究激励措施以及针对未成年无家可归青少年使用同意书达成共识。