Ruetten Sebastian, Komp Martin, Merk Harry, Godolias Georgios
Department of Spine Surgery and Pain Therapy, Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, St. Anna-Hospital Herne, University of Witten/Herdecke, Herne, Germany.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):940-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b67.
Prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with lateral cervical disc herniations, operated either in a full-endoscopic posterior or conventional microsurgical anterior technique.
Comparison of results of cervical discectomies in full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy technique with the conventional microsurgical anterior decompression and fusion.
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion is the standard procedure for operation of cervical disc herniations with radicular arm pain. Mobility-preserving posterior foraminotomy is the most common alternative in the case of lateral localization of the pathology. Despite good clinical results, problems may arise due to traumatization of the access. Endoscopic techniques are considered standard in many areas, since they may offer advantages in surgical technique and rehabilitation. These days, all disc herniations of the lumbar spine can be operated in full-endoscopic technique. With the full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy a procedures is available for cervical disc operations.
One hundred and seventy-five patients with full-endoscopic posterior or microsurgical anterior cervical discectomy underwent follow-up for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: VAS, German version North American Spine Society Instrument, Hilibrand Criteria.
After surgery 87.4% of the patients no longer had arm pain, and 9.2% had occasional pain. The clinical results were the same in both groups. There were no significant difference between the groups in the revision or complication rate. The full-endoscopic technique brought advantages in operation technique, preserving mobility, rehabilitation, and traumatization.
The recorded results show that the full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy is a sufficient and safe supplement and alternative to conventional procedures when the indication criteria are fulfilled. At the same time, it offers the advantages of a minimally invasive intervention.
对颈椎间盘外侧突出症患者进行前瞻性、随机对照研究,采用全内镜后路或传统显微外科前路技术进行手术。
比较全内镜后路椎间孔切开术与传统显微外科前路减压融合术治疗颈椎间盘切除术的效果。
颈椎前路减压融合术是治疗伴有神经根性臂痛的颈椎间盘突出症的标准手术方法。对于病变位于外侧的情况,保留活动度的后路椎间孔切开术是最常见的替代方法。尽管临床效果良好,但由于手术入路的创伤可能会出现问题。内镜技术在许多领域被视为标准技术,因为它们在手术技术和康复方面可能具有优势。如今,所有腰椎间盘突出症都可以采用全内镜技术进行手术。全内镜后路颈椎椎间孔切开术为颈椎间盘手术提供了一种手术方式。
175例行全内镜后路或显微外科前路颈椎间盘切除术的患者接受了2年的随访。除了一般和特定参数外,还使用了以下测量工具:视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、德国版北美脊柱协会器械、希利布兰德标准。
术后87.4%的患者不再有臂痛,9.2%的患者偶尔有疼痛。两组的临床结果相同。两组在翻修率或并发症发生率方面无显著差异。全内镜技术在手术技术、保留活动度、康复和创伤方面具有优势。
记录结果表明,当符合适应证标准时,全内镜后路椎间孔切开术是传统手术的一种充分且安全的补充和替代方法。同时,它具有微创干预的优势。