Ostlund Sean B, Balleine Bernard W
Department of Psychology and the Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1563, USA.
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4398-405. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5472-07.2008.
Although it has been shown that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and the mediodorsal thalamus (MD) are critical for goal-directed instrumental performance, much remains unknown about the respective contributions of these structures to action selection. The current study assessed the effects of post-training BLA and MD lesions on several tests of instrumental action selection. We found that MD damage disrupted the influence of pavlovian cues over action selection but left intact rats' ability to select actions based on either the expected value or the discriminative stimulus properties of the outcome. In contrast, BLA lesions impaired performance on all three tests of action selection. Because both lesion types disrupted the influence of cues that signal reward over instrumental performance, we then investigated the involvement of these structures in pavlovian contingency learning using a task in which the predictive status of one of two cues is degraded by delivering its outcome noncontingently during the intertrial interval. As expected, the sham group selectively suppressed their conditioned approach performance to the cue that no longer signaled its outcome but continued to respond to the control stimulus. In contrast, both lesioned groups were impaired on this task. Interestingly, whereas the MD group displayed a nonspecific reduction in responding to both cues, the BLA group continued to show high levels of responding to both cues as if their performance was completely insensitive to this contingency manipulation. These findings demonstrate that the BLA and MD make important yet distinct contributions to instrumental action selection.
尽管已有研究表明基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)和背内侧丘脑(MD)对目标导向的工具性表现至关重要,但关于这些结构对动作选择的各自贡献仍有许多未知之处。本研究评估了训练后BLA和MD损伤对几种工具性动作选择测试的影响。我们发现,MD损伤破坏了巴甫洛夫线索对动作选择的影响,但大鼠基于结果的预期价值或辨别性刺激特性来选择动作的能力未受影响。相比之下,BLA损伤损害了所有三项动作选择测试的表现。由于两种损伤类型都破坏了信号奖励的线索对工具性表现的影响,我们随后使用一项任务研究了这些结构在巴甫洛夫条件学习中的参与情况,在该任务中,两个线索之一的预测状态通过在试验间隔期间非条件性地给予其结果而降低。正如预期的那样,假手术组选择性地抑制了对不再预示其结果的线索的条件性接近表现,但继续对对照刺激做出反应。相比之下,两个损伤组在这项任务中都受损。有趣的是,MD组对两个线索的反应均出现非特异性降低,而BLA组对两个线索的反应仍保持高水平,就好像它们的表现对这种条件性操作完全不敏感一样。这些发现表明,BLA和MD对工具性动作选择做出了重要但不同的贡献。