Suppr超能文献

肉瘤治疗临床试验反应标准的选择。

Selection of response criteria for clinical trials of sarcoma treatment.

作者信息

Schuetze Scott M, Baker Laurence H, Benjamin Robert S, Canetta Renzo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, C409 MIB, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5843, USA. scotschu@umich

出版信息

Oncologist. 2008;13 Suppl 2:32-40. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.13-S2-32.

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. A large number of new therapies are being evaluated in patients with sarcomas, and consensus criteria defining treatment responses are essential for comparison of results from studies completed by different research groups. The 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) handbook set forth operationally defined criteria for response evaluation in solid tumors that were updated in 2000 with the publication of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). There have been significant advances in tumor imaging, however, that are not reflected in the RECIST. For example, computed tomography (CT) slice thickness has been reduced from 10 mm to < or =2.5 mm, allowing for more reproducible and accurate measurement of smaller lesions. Combination of imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG-PET) and CT can provide investigators and clinicians with both anatomical and functional information regarding tumors, and there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of PET/CT and other newer imaging methods for the detection and staging of tumors as well as early determination of responses to therapy. The application of newer imaging methods has the potential to decrease both the sample sizes required for, and duration of, clinical trials by providing an early indication of therapeutic response that is well correlated with clinical outcomes, such as time to tumor progression or overall survival. The results summarized in this review support the conclusion that the RECIST and the WHO criteria for evaluation of response in solid tumors need to be modernized. In addition, there is a current need for prospective trials to compare new response criteria with established endpoints and to validate imaging-based response rates as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials of new agents for sarcoma and other solid tumors.

摘要

软组织肉瘤是一组起源于间充质组织的异质性恶性肿瘤。大量新疗法正在肉瘤患者中进行评估,而定义治疗反应的共识标准对于比较不同研究小组完成的研究结果至关重要。1979年世界卫生组织(WHO)手册提出了实体瘤反应评估的操作性定义标准,该标准在2000年随着《实体瘤反应评估标准》(RECIST)的出版而更新。然而,肿瘤成像技术有了显著进展,而RECIST并未体现这些进展。例如,计算机断层扫描(CT)切片厚度已从10毫米降至≤2.5毫米,从而能够更可重复且准确地测量较小病变。成像技术的联合应用,如正电子发射断层扫描与氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖(18FDG-PET)和CT相结合,可为研究人员和临床医生提供有关肿瘤的解剖学和功能信息,现在有大量证据表明PET/CT和其他更新的成像方法在肿瘤检测、分期以及早期确定治疗反应方面的有效性。应用更新的成像方法有可能通过提供与临床结果(如肿瘤进展时间或总生存期)高度相关的治疗反应早期指标,来减少临床试验所需的样本量和持续时间。本综述总结的结果支持以下结论:RECIST和WHO实体瘤反应评估标准需要现代化。此外,目前需要进行前瞻性试验,以比较新的反应标准与既定终点,并验证基于成像的反应率作为肉瘤和其他实体瘤新药物临床试验替代终点的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验