Kourbatova Ekaterina V, Akovbyan Vagan A, Chesson Harrell W, Lytkina Irina N, Dmitriev Georgyi A, Tikhonova Lilia I, Koubanova Anna A, Petukhova Irina I, Latypova Munira F, Aboymova Olga A, Lewis Joel S, Ryan Caroline A, Shakarishvili Anna
Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 May;35(5):453-60. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816f1c65.
In the Russian Federation, large sectors of the population regularly undergo mandatory occupational screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence of syphilis and gonorrhea in the screened occupational groups in Moscow and to conduct a cost-effectiveness evaluation of the occupational screening program.
Serum samples from 4 main occupational groups (food handlers and other food industry workers, market salespersons, education and health care providers, and hotel and other public utility workers) were tested for syphilis and gonorrhea. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis (in 2003 rubles) of the screening program using decision analysis models.
In the total sample of 1000 study participants, overall prevalence for syphilis was 1.2% with the highest rate in market salespersons (4.4%) and for gonorrhea 0.3%. The incremental cost per case of STI treated was 8409 rubles ($252) for syphilis screening (compared with no screening) with higher incremental costs associated with expanding the program to include gonorrhea screening. The relatively low STI prevalence in the screened groups and the poor performance of the diagnostic tests used were important factors in the estimated cost-effectiveness of occupation-based screening.
Modifications to occupation-based screening, including an increased focus on higher risk population and the adoption of more current diagnostic technologies, could help to use prevention resources more effectively.
在俄罗斯联邦,大部分人口定期接受性传播感染(STIs)的强制性职业筛查。我们研究的目的是确定莫斯科接受筛查的职业群体中梅毒和淋病的患病率,并对职业筛查项目进行成本效益评估。
对4个主要职业群体(食品处理人员和其他食品行业工人、市场销售人员、教育和医疗保健提供者以及酒店和其他公共事业工人)的血清样本进行梅毒和淋病检测。我们使用决策分析模型对筛查项目进行了成本效益分析(以2003年卢布计)。
在1000名研究参与者的总样本中,梅毒的总体患病率为1.2%,市场销售人员中的患病率最高(4.4%),淋病的患病率为0.3%。梅毒筛查(与不筛查相比)每治疗一例性传播感染的增量成本为8409卢布(252美元),将该项目扩大到包括淋病筛查会带来更高的增量成本。筛查群体中性传播感染的相对低患病率以及所用诊断测试的不佳表现是基于职业筛查的估计成本效益的重要因素。
对基于职业的筛查进行修改,包括更多地关注高风险人群以及采用更新的诊断技术,有助于更有效地利用预防资源。