de Vries-Bouwstra J K, Goekoop-Ruiterman Y P M, Verpoort K N, Schreuder G M T, Ewals J A P M, Terwiel J P, Ronday H K, Kerstens P J S M, Toes R E M, de Vries R R P, Breedveld F C, Dijkmans B A C, Huizinga T W J, Allaart C F
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May;58(5):1293-8. doi: 10.1002/art.23439.
To determine the association of HLA-DRB1, rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status with progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated according to different treatment strategies.
The present study was conducted using data from the BeSt study (Behandelstrategieën voor Reumatoide Artritis [treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis]), a randomized trial comparing 4 targeted (toward achievement of a Disease Activity Score [DAS] of < or =2.4) treatment strategies: sequential monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and prednisone (group 3), and initial combination therapy with methotrexate and infliximab (group 4), in 508 patients with early RA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict progressive disease (increase of Sharp/van der Heijde score over 2 years beyond the smallest detectable change [4.6]) according to the presence or absence of the shared epitope (SE), DERAA, RF, and ACPA, with correction for other baseline characteristics.
Progressive disease could not be predicted by presence of the SE: the odds ratio in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, was 1.4, 2.6, 1.9, and 3.0. DERAA carriership did not protect against progressive disease (odds ratio 0.4, 1.4, 0.9, and 0.9 in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). RF positivity and ACPA positivity predicted progressive disease in group 1 (odds ratio 4.7 [95% confidence interval 1.5-14.5] for RF and 12.6 [95% confidence interval 3.0-51.9] for ACPA), but not in groups 2-4 (for RF, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.5 [0.5-4.9], 1.0 [0.3-3.3], and 1.4 [0.4-4.8] in group 2, group 3, and group 4, respectively; for ACPA, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.4 [0.8-14.2], 1.7 [0.5-5.4], and 1.8 [0.5-6.8] in group 2, group 3, and group 4).
In patients with early RA treated with the goal of tight control of the DAS, no significant association between HLA-DRB1 status and radiographic progression was found. RF and ACPA were predictive of progressive disease only in patients treated with sequential monotherapy. These observations suggest that effective treatment can prevent radiographic progression, even in patients with risk factors for severe damage.
确定根据不同治疗策略治疗的早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,HLA - DRB1、类风湿因子(RF)和抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体(ACPA)状态与关节损伤进展的关联。
本研究使用了BeSt研究(类风湿关节炎治疗策略研究)的数据,这是一项随机试验,比较了4种目标(实现疾病活动评分[DAS]≤2.4)治疗策略:序贯单药治疗(第1组)、逐步联合治疗(第2组)、甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和泼尼松初始联合治疗(第3组)以及甲氨蝶呤和英夫利昔单抗初始联合治疗(第4组),共纳入508例早期RA患者。多变量逻辑回归分析用于根据共享表位(SE)、DERAA、RF和ACPA的有无预测疾病进展(Sharp/van der Heijde评分在2年内超过最小可检测变化[4.6]),并对其他基线特征进行校正。
SE的存在无法预测疾病进展:第1、2、3和4组的优势比分别为1.4、2.6、1.9和3.0。DERAA携带者不能预防疾病进展(第1、2、3和4组的优势比分别为0.4、1.4、0.9和0.9)。RF阳性和ACPA阳性在第1组中可预测疾病进展(RF的优势比为4.7[95%置信区间1.5 - 14.5],ACPA的优势比为12.6[95%置信区间3.0 - 51.9]),但在第2 - 4组中则不然(对于RF,第2、3和4组的优势比[95%置信区间]分别为1.5[0.5 - 4.9]、1.0[0.3 - 3.3]和1.4[0.4 - 4.8];对于ACPA,第2、3和4组的优势比[95%置信区间]分别为3.4[0.8 - 14.2]、1.7[0.5 - 5.4]和1.8[0.5 - 6.8])。
在以严格控制DAS为目标治疗的早期RA患者中,未发现HLA - DRB1状态与影像学进展之间存在显著关联。RF和ACPA仅在接受序贯单药治疗的患者中可预测疾病进展。这些观察结果表明,即使在有严重损伤风险因素的患者中,有效治疗也可预防影像学进展。