Suppr超能文献

辅助控制通气的闭环控制是否能减少呼吸机相关性肺损伤?

Does closed loop control of assist control ventilation reduce ventilator-induced lung injury?

作者信息

Branson Richard D, Davis Kenneth

机构信息

University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chest Med. 2008 Jun;29(2):343-50, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.01.006.

Abstract

The standard of care for mechanical ventilation of the patient who has acute lung injury remains volume control ventilation at 6 mL/kg. Despite this fact, clinicians often employ pressure control ventilation and adaptive pressure control ventilation in an attempt to improve synchrony and limit the possibility for overdistension. Adaptive pressure control uses pressure control breaths to guarantee a minimum delivered tidal volume. Other techniques (such as adaptive support ventilation) use pressure-limited breaths, switching between time and flow cycling based on patient effort. Neither of these techniques has been compared with volume control in a randomized setting. Understanding operation of these techniques is essential for determining any impact on outcome or ventilator induced lung injury.

摘要

对于急性肺损伤患者,机械通气的标准护理方式仍是采用6毫升/千克的容量控制通气。尽管如此,临床医生经常采用压力控制通气和自适应压力控制通气,试图改善同步性并限制肺过度扩张的可能性。自适应压力控制利用压力控制呼吸来确保输送的潮气量达到最低值。其他技术(如自适应支持通气)采用压力限制呼吸,根据患者的用力情况在时间切换和流量切换之间进行转换。这些技术均未在随机试验中与容量控制通气进行比较。了解这些技术的操作对于确定其对治疗结果或呼吸机所致肺损伤的任何影响至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验