Ahmad Farah, Hogg-Johnson Sheilah, Skinner Harvey A
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Apr 18;10(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.955.
Computer-based health-risk assessments are electronic surveys which can be completed by patients privately, for example during their waiting time in a clinic, generating a risk report for the clinician and a recommendation sheet for the patient at the point of care. Despite increasing popularity of such computer-based health-risk assessments, patient attitudes toward such tools are rarely evaluated by reliable and valid scales. The lack of psychometric appraisal of appropriate scales is an obstacle to advancing the field.
This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a 14-item Computerized Lifestyle Assessment Scale (CLAS).
Out of 212 female patients receiving the study information at a family practice clinic, 202 completed a paper questionnaire, for a response rate of 97.6%. After 2 weeks, 52 patients completed the scale a second time.
Principal component analysis revealed that CLAS is a multidimensional scale consisting of four subscales (factors): (1) BENEFITS: patient-perceived benefits toward the quality of medical consultation and means of achieving them, (2) Privacy-Barrier: concerns about information privacy, (3) Interaction-Barrier: concerns about potential interference in their interaction with the physician, and (4) Interest: patient interest in computer-assisted health assessments. Each subscale had good internal consistency reliability ranging from .50 (2-item scale) to .85 (6-item scale). The study also provided evidence of scale stability over time with intraclass correlation coefficients of .91, .82, .86, and .67 for the four subscales, respectively. Construct validity was supported by concurrent hypotheses testing.
The CLAS is a promising approach for evaluating patients' attitudes toward computer-based health-risk assessments.
基于计算机的健康风险评估是一种电子调查问卷,患者可以私下完成,例如在诊所候诊时,在护理点为临床医生生成一份风险报告,并为患者生成一份推荐表。尽管此类基于计算机的健康风险评估越来越受欢迎,但很少通过可靠有效的量表来评估患者对此类工具的态度。缺乏对合适量表的心理测量评估是该领域发展的一个障碍。
本研究评估了一个包含14个条目的计算机化生活方式评估量表(CLAS)的心理测量特性。
在一家家庭医疗诊所接受研究信息的212名女性患者中,202名完成了纸质问卷,回复率为97.6%。两周后,52名患者再次完成了该量表。
主成分分析显示,CLAS是一个多维量表,由四个子量表(因子)组成:(1)益处:患者对医疗咨询质量及其实现方式的感知益处;(2)隐私障碍:对信息隐私的担忧;(3)互动障碍:对其与医生互动中潜在干扰的担忧;(4)兴趣:患者对计算机辅助健康评估的兴趣。每个子量表都具有良好的内部一致性信度,范围从0.50(2个条目量表)到0.85(6个条目量表)。该研究还提供了量表随时间稳定性的证据,四个子量表的组内相关系数分别为0.91、0.82、0.86和0.67。同时性假设检验支持了结构效度。
CLAS是评估患者对基于计算机的健康风险评估态度的一种有前景的方法。