Suppr超能文献

一项针对唇腭裂和牙齿异常的全基因组连锁扫描。

A genome wide linkage scan for cleft lip and palate and dental anomalies.

作者信息

Vieira Alexandre R, McHenry Toby G, Daack-Hirsch Sandra, Murray Jeffrey C, Marazita Mary L

机构信息

Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Jun 1;146A(11):1406-13. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32295.

Abstract

We revisited 46 families with two or more siblings affected with an orofacial cleft that participated in previous genome wide studies and collected complete dental information. Genotypes from 392 microsatellite markers at 10 cM intervals were reanalyzed. We carried out four sets of genome wide analyses. First, we ran the analysis solely on the cleft status. Second, we assigned to any dental anomaly (tooth agenesis, supernumerary teeth, and microdontia) an affection status, and repeated the analysis. Third, we ran only the 19 families where the proband had a cleft with no dental anomalies. Finally, we ran only the 27 families that had a proband with cleft and additional dental anomalies outside the cleft area. Chromosomes (1, 2, 6, 8, 16, and 19) presented regions with LOD scores >2.0. Chromosome 19 has the most compelling results in our study. The LOD scores increased from 3.11 (in the scan of all 46 families with clefts as the only assigned affection status) to 3.91 when the 19 families whose probands present with no additional dental anomalies were studied, suggesting the interval 19p13.12-19q12 may contain a gene that contributes to clefts but not to dental anomalies. On the other hand, we found a LOD score of 3.00 in the 2q22.3 region when dental anomalies data were added to the analysis to define affection status. Our preliminary results support the hypothesis that some loci may contribute to both clefts and congenital dental anomalies. Also, adding dental anomalies information will provide new opportunities to map susceptibility loci for clefts.

摘要

我们回访了46个有两个或更多患口面部裂隙的兄弟姐妹的家庭,这些家庭曾参与过之前的全基因组研究,并收集了完整的牙齿信息。对间隔为10厘摩的392个微卫星标记的基因型进行了重新分析。我们进行了四组全基因组分析。首先,我们仅根据裂隙状态进行分析。其次,我们将任何牙齿异常(牙齿缺失、多生牙和过小牙)指定为患病状态,并重复分析。第三,我们仅对先证者有裂隙且无牙齿异常的19个家庭进行分析。最后,我们仅对先证者有裂隙且在裂隙区域外还有其他牙齿异常的27个家庭进行分析。染色体(1、2、6、8、16和19)呈现出对数优势分数(LOD)>2.0的区域。在我们的研究中,19号染色体的结果最有说服力。当以所有46个有裂隙的家庭作为唯一指定的患病状态进行扫描时,LOD分数为3.11,而当研究先证者无其他牙齿异常的19个家庭时,LOD分数增加到3.91,这表明19p13.12 - 19q12区间可能包含一个导致裂隙但不导致牙齿异常的基因。另一方面,当在分析中加入牙齿异常数据以定义患病状态时,我们在2q22.3区域发现了一个LOD分数为3.00的结果。我们的初步结果支持这样的假设,即一些基因座可能导致裂隙和先天性牙齿异常。此外,加入牙齿异常信息将为绘制裂隙易感基因座提供新的机会。

相似文献

1
A genome wide linkage scan for cleft lip and palate and dental anomalies.
Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Jun 1;146A(11):1406-13. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32295.
3
Side of dental anomalies and taurodontism as potential clinical markers for cleft subphenotypes.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Jan;48(1):103-8. doi: 10.1597/09-159. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
4
Spectrum of Dental Phenotypes in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefting.
J Dent Res. 2015 Jul;94(7):905-12. doi: 10.1177/0022034515588281.
6
Defining predictors of cleft lip and palate risk.
J Dent Res. 2012 Jun;91(6):556-61. doi: 10.1177/0022034512444928. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Talon Cusp Associates With MMP2 in a Cohort of Individuals Born With Oral Clefts.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 May;58(5):597-602. doi: 10.1177/1055665620958569. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Could maternal stress be a causal factor for nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate: A retrospective study.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Aug;13(Suppl 1):S36-S40. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_326_21. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Taiwanese Children with Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate.
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 13;12(10):1708. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101708.
3
Pulp enlargement in individuals born with cleft lip and palate pulp, a radiographic study from the cleft lip and palate service of paraiba, Brazil'.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021 Dec;22(6):1101-1106. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00673-8. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Gene-environment interaction in molar-incisor hypomineralization.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0241898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241898. eCollection 2021.
5
Maxillary incisor enamel defects in individuals born with cleft lip/palate.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244506. eCollection 2020.
8
The prevalence, penetrance, and expressivity of etiologic variants in orofacial clefts patients from sub-Saharan Africa.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017 Jan 12;5(2):164-171. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.273. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Cleft lip and palate and related factors: A 10 years study in university hospitalised patients at Mashhad--Iran.
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015 Oct-Dec;12(4):286-90. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.172576.

本文引用的文献

1
Suggestive linkage to a neighboring region of IRF6 in a cleft lip and palate multiplex family.
Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Nov 15;143A(22):2716-21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32011.
2
Defining subphenotypes for oral clefts based on dental development.
J Dent Res. 2007 Oct;86(10):986-91. doi: 10.1177/154405910708601013.
4
CRISPLD2: a novel NSCLP candidate gene.
Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Sep 15;16(18):2241-8. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm176. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
5
Linkage disequilibrium analysis of two genes mapping on OFC3: PVR and PVRL2.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;15(9):992-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201868. Epub 2007 May 30.
6
A genome-wide linkage scan for cleft lip and cleft palate identifies a novel locus on 8p11-23.
Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Apr 15;143A(8):846-52. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31673.
9
Asian oral-facial cleft birth prevalence.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):580-9. doi: 10.1597/05-167.
10
Genetic evidence for the role of loci at 19q13 in cleft lip and palate.
J Med Genet. 2006 Jun;43(6):e26. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.034785.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验