Vieira Alexandre R, McHenry Toby G, Daack-Hirsch Sandra, Murray Jeffrey C, Marazita Mary L
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.
Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Jun 1;146A(11):1406-13. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32295.
We revisited 46 families with two or more siblings affected with an orofacial cleft that participated in previous genome wide studies and collected complete dental information. Genotypes from 392 microsatellite markers at 10 cM intervals were reanalyzed. We carried out four sets of genome wide analyses. First, we ran the analysis solely on the cleft status. Second, we assigned to any dental anomaly (tooth agenesis, supernumerary teeth, and microdontia) an affection status, and repeated the analysis. Third, we ran only the 19 families where the proband had a cleft with no dental anomalies. Finally, we ran only the 27 families that had a proband with cleft and additional dental anomalies outside the cleft area. Chromosomes (1, 2, 6, 8, 16, and 19) presented regions with LOD scores >2.0. Chromosome 19 has the most compelling results in our study. The LOD scores increased from 3.11 (in the scan of all 46 families with clefts as the only assigned affection status) to 3.91 when the 19 families whose probands present with no additional dental anomalies were studied, suggesting the interval 19p13.12-19q12 may contain a gene that contributes to clefts but not to dental anomalies. On the other hand, we found a LOD score of 3.00 in the 2q22.3 region when dental anomalies data were added to the analysis to define affection status. Our preliminary results support the hypothesis that some loci may contribute to both clefts and congenital dental anomalies. Also, adding dental anomalies information will provide new opportunities to map susceptibility loci for clefts.
我们回访了46个有两个或更多患口面部裂隙的兄弟姐妹的家庭,这些家庭曾参与过之前的全基因组研究,并收集了完整的牙齿信息。对间隔为10厘摩的392个微卫星标记的基因型进行了重新分析。我们进行了四组全基因组分析。首先,我们仅根据裂隙状态进行分析。其次,我们将任何牙齿异常(牙齿缺失、多生牙和过小牙)指定为患病状态,并重复分析。第三,我们仅对先证者有裂隙且无牙齿异常的19个家庭进行分析。最后,我们仅对先证者有裂隙且在裂隙区域外还有其他牙齿异常的27个家庭进行分析。染色体(1、2、6、8、16和19)呈现出对数优势分数(LOD)>2.0的区域。在我们的研究中,19号染色体的结果最有说服力。当以所有46个有裂隙的家庭作为唯一指定的患病状态进行扫描时,LOD分数为3.11,而当研究先证者无其他牙齿异常的19个家庭时,LOD分数增加到3.91,这表明19p13.12 - 19q12区间可能包含一个导致裂隙但不导致牙齿异常的基因。另一方面,当在分析中加入牙齿异常数据以定义患病状态时,我们在2q22.3区域发现了一个LOD分数为3.00的结果。我们的初步结果支持这样的假设,即一些基因座可能导致裂隙和先天性牙齿异常。此外,加入牙齿异常信息将为绘制裂隙易感基因座提供新的机会。