Suppr超能文献

痴呆症诊断的适当披露:识别“最佳实践”的关键行为。

Appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: identifying the key behaviours of 'best practice'.

作者信息

Lecouturier Jan, Bamford Claire, Hughes Julian C, Francis Jillian J, Foy Robbie, Johnston Marie, Eccles Martin P

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 1;8:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-95.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite growing evidence that many people with dementia want to know their diagnosis, there is wide variation in attitudes of professionals towards disclosure. The disclosure of the diagnosis of dementia is increasingly recognised as being a process rather than a one-off behaviour. However, the different behaviours that contribute to this process have not been comprehensively defined. No intervention studies to improve diagnostic disclosure in dementia have been reported to date. As part of a larger study to develop an intervention to promote appropriate disclosure, we sought to identify important disclosure behaviours and explore whether supplementing a literature review with other methods would result in the identification of new behaviours.

METHODS

To identify a comprehensive list of behaviours in disclosure we conducted a literature review, interviewed people with dementia and informal carers, and used a consensus process involving health and social care professionals. Content analysis of the full list of behaviours was carried out.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with four people with dementia and six informal carers. Eight health and social care professionals took part in the consensus panel. From the interviews, consensus panel and literature review 220 behaviours were elicited, with 109 behaviours over-lapping. The interviews and consensus panel elicited 27 behaviours supplementary to the review. Those from the interviews appeared to be self-evident but highlighted deficiencies in current practice and from the panel focused largely on balancing the needs of people with dementia and family members. Behaviours were grouped into eight categories: preparing for disclosure; integrating family members; exploring the patient's perspective; disclosing the diagnosis; responding to patient reactions; focusing on quality of life and well-being; planning for the future; and communicating effectively.

CONCLUSION

This exercise has highlighted the complexity of the process of disclosing a diagnosis of dementia in an appropriate manner. It confirms that many of the behaviours identified in the literature (often based on professional opinion rather than empirical evidence) also resonate with people with dementia and informal carers. The presence of contradictory behaviours emphasises the need to tailor the process of disclosure to individual patients and carers. Our combined methods may be relevant to other efforts to identify and define complex clinical practices for further study.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的证据表明许多痴呆症患者想知道自己的诊断结果,但专业人员对于告知诊断结果的态度却存在很大差异。痴呆症诊断结果的告知日益被视为一个过程,而非一次性行为。然而,构成这一过程的不同行为尚未得到全面界定。迄今为止,尚无改善痴呆症诊断告知情况的干预性研究报告。作为一项旨在开发促进恰当告知的干预措施的大型研究的一部分,我们试图确定重要的告知行为,并探讨用其他方法补充文献综述是否会带来新行为的识别。

方法

为确定告知行为的完整清单,我们进行了文献综述,采访了痴呆症患者及其非正式护理人员,并采用了涉及健康和社会护理专业人员的共识达成过程。对行为的完整清单进行了内容分析。

结果

采访了4名痴呆症患者和6名非正式护理人员。8名健康和社会护理专业人员参与了共识小组。通过访谈、共识小组和文献综述,共引出220种行为,其中109种行为重叠。访谈和共识小组引出了27种文献综述之外的行为。访谈中出现的行为似乎显而易见,但凸显了当前实践中的不足,而共识小组的行为主要集中在平衡痴呆症患者和家庭成员的需求上。行为被分为八类:为告知做准备;让家庭成员参与进来;探究患者的观点;告知诊断结果;应对患者的反应;关注生活质量和幸福感;规划未来;以及有效沟通。

结论

这项工作突出了以恰当方式告知痴呆症诊断结果这一过程的复杂性。它证实了文献中确定的许多行为(通常基于专业意见而非实证证据)也与痴呆症患者及其非正式护理人员产生共鸣。相互矛盾的行为的存在强调了针对个体患者和护理人员调整告知过程的必要性。我们的综合方法可能与其他旨在识别和定义复杂临床实践以供进一步研究的努力相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb9/2408568/579dac79f1c4/1472-6963-8-95-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验