Porter Michael, Spear William, Akar Joseph G, Helms Ray, Brysiewicz Neil, Santucci Peter, Wilber David J
Cardiovascular Institute, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):613-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01189.x. Epub 2008 May 5.
Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 +/- 18 sites/patient were identified (20 +/- 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. One-year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long-term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study.
复杂碎裂心房电图(CFAE)可识别心房颤动(AF)持续存在的关键部位,并为消融提供有用靶点。目前对CFAE的评估是主观的;自动检测算法可能会提高可重复性,但它们在指导消融方面的效用尚未得到测试。
67例因首次AF消融就诊的患者(42例阵发性,25例持续性),在诱发或自发AF期间进行左心房(LA)和冠状窦(CS)标测。通过在线自动计算机算法识别CFAE,并显示在电解剖图上。平均每位患者识别出28±18个部位(占标测部位的20±13%),在持续性AF期间更常见。CFAE最常出现在CS内、房间隔上以及肺静脉周围。最初以CFAE为靶点的消融使88%的阵发性AF终止,但仅使20%的持续性AF终止(P<0.001)。随后,所有患者均进行了额外消融(阵发性AF行肺静脉隔离,持续性AF行肺静脉隔离+二尖瓣和房顶线消融)。最短随访时间为1年。单次手术后,阵发性AF患者在无抗心律失常药物治疗的情况下1年无复发性房性心律失常的比例为90%,持续性AF患者为68%。
由CFAE自动检测引导的消融被证明是可行的,并且在阵发性AF中与高AF终止率相关,但在持续性AF中并非如此。作为传统技术的辅助手段,两组患者单次手术的长期效果均良好。确定最佳CFAE消融部位的标准以及选择最可能受益的患者需要进一步研究。