Goodyer I M, Dubicka B, Wilkinson P, Kelvin R, Roberts C, Byford S, Breen S, Ford C, Barrett B, Leech A, Rothwell J, White L, Harrington R
Developmental Psychiatry Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(14):iii-iv, ix-60. doi: 10.3310/hta12140.
To determine if, in the short term, depressed adolescents attending routine NHS Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), and receiving ongoing active clinical care, treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) plus cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) compared with SSRI alone, results in better healthcare outcomes.
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on depressed adolescents attending CAMHS who had not responded to a psychosocial brief initial intervention (BII) prior to randomisation.
Six English CAMHS participated in the study.
A total of 208 patients aged between 11 and 17 years were recruited and randomised.
All participants received active routine clinical care in a CAMHS outpatient setting and an SSRI and half were offered CBT.
The duration of the trial was a 12-week treatment phase, followed by a 16-week maintenance phase. Follow-up assessments were at 6, 12 and 28 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Secondary outcome measures were self-report depressive symptoms, interviewer-rated depressive signs and symptoms, interviewer-rated psychosocial impairment and clinical global impression of response to treatment. Information on resource use was collected in interview at baseline and at the 12- and 28-week follow-up assessments using the Child and Adolescent Service Use Schedule (CA-SUS).
Of the 208 patients randomised, 200 (96%) completed the trial to the primary end-point at 12 weeks. By the 28-week follow-up, 174 (84%) participants were re-evaluated. Overall, 193 (93%) participants had been assessed at one or more time points. Clinical characteristics indicated that the trial was conducted on a severely depressed group. There was significant recovery at all time points in both arms. The findings demonstrated no difference in treatment effectiveness for SSRI + CBT over SSRI only for the primary or secondary outcome measures at any time point. This lack of difference held when baseline and treatment characteristics where taken into account (age, sex, severity, co-morbid characteristics, quality and quantity of CBT treatment, number of clinic attendances). The SSRI + CBT group was somewhat more expensive over the 28 weeks than the SSRI-only group (p=0.057) and no more cost-effective. Over the trial period there was on average a decrease in suicidal thoughts and self-harm compared with levels recorded at baseline. There was no significant increase in disinhibition, irritability and violence compared with levels at baseline. Around 20% (n=40) of patients in the trial were non-responders. Of these, 17 (43%) showed no improvement by 28 weeks and 23 (57%) were considered minimally (n=10) or moderately to severely worse (n=13).
For moderately to severely depressed adolescents who are non-responsive to a BII, the addition of CBT to fluoxetine plus routine clinical care does not improve outcome or confer protective effects against adverse events and is not cost-effective. SSRIs (mostly fluoxetine) are not likely to result in harmful adverse effects. The findings are broadly consistent with existing guidelines on the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Modification is advised for those presenting with moderate (6-8 symptoms) to severe depressions (>8 symptoms) and in those with either overt suicidal risk and/or high levels of personal impairment. In such cases, the time allowed for response to psychosocial interventions should be no more than 2-4 weeks, after which fluoxetine should be prescribed. Further research should focus on evaluating the efficacy of specific psychological treatments against brief psychological intervention, determining the characteristics of patients with severe depression who are non-responsive to fluoxetine, relapse prevention in severe depression and improving tools for determining treatment responders and non-responders.
确定对于短期内在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)儿童与青少年心理健康服务机构(CAMHS)接受常规治疗且正在接受积极临床护理的抑郁青少年,与单独使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)相比,使用SSRI加认知行为疗法(CBT)是否能带来更好的医疗结果。
对在CAMHS就诊、在随机分组前对社会心理简短初始干预(BII)无反应的抑郁青少年进行了一项实用随机对照试验(RCT)。
六个英国CAMHS机构参与了该研究。
共招募并随机分组了208名年龄在11至17岁之间的患者。
所有参与者在CAMHS门诊接受积极的常规临床护理并服用一种SSRI,其中一半还接受了CBT。
试验为期12周的治疗阶段,随后是16周的维持阶段。随访评估在第6、12和28周进行。主要结局指标是儿童与青少年国家健康结局量表(HoNOSCA)。次要结局指标包括自我报告的抑郁症状、访谈者评定的抑郁体征和症状、访谈者评定的社会心理损害以及对治疗反应的临床总体印象。使用儿童与青少年服务使用时间表(CA-SUS)在基线以及第12周和第28周的随访评估时通过访谈收集资源使用信息。
在随机分组的208名患者中,200名(96%)在第12周完成了至主要终点的试验。到第28周随访时,174名(84%)参与者接受了重新评估。总体而言,193名(93%)参与者在一个或多个时间点接受了评估。临床特征表明该试验是在一组重度抑郁患者中进行的。两组在所有时间点均有显著恢复。研究结果表明,在任何时间点,对于主要或次要结局指标,SSRI + CBT与仅使用SSRI相比,治疗效果没有差异。在考虑基线和治疗特征(年龄、性别、严重程度、共病特征、CBT治疗的质量和数量、门诊就诊次数)时,这种差异依然存在。在28周内,SSRI + CBT组比仅使用SSRI组略贵(p = 0.057),且成本效益不更高。在试验期间,与基线记录水平相比,自杀念头和自我伤害平均有所减少。与基线水平相比,抑制解除、易怒和暴力行为没有显著增加。试验中约20%(n = 40)的患者无反应。其中,17名(43%)在第28周时无改善,23名(57%)被认为改善极小(n = 10)或中度至重度恶化(n = 13)。
对于对BII无反应的中度至重度抑郁青少年,在氟西汀加常规临床护理的基础上增加CBT并不能改善结局或对不良事件产生保护作用,且不具有成本效益。SSRI(主要是氟西汀)不太可能导致有害的不良反应。研究结果与现有关于中度至重度抑郁症治疗的指南大致一致。对于表现为中度(6 - 8个症状)至重度抑郁(>8个症状)以及有明显自杀风险和/或严重个人损害的患者,建议进行调整。在这种情况下,对社会心理干预的反应时间应不超过2 - 4周,之后应开具氟西汀。进一步的研究应侧重于评估特定心理治疗相对于简短心理干预的疗效,确定对氟西汀无反应的重度抑郁患者的特征,重度抑郁症的复发预防以及改进确定治疗反应者和无反应者的工具。