Robertson Michelle M, Huang Yueng-Hsiang, O'Neill Michael J, Schleifer Lawrence M
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Rd., Hopkinton, MA, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2008 Jul;39(4):482-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.022. Epub 2008 May 6.
A macroergonomics intervention consisting of flexible workspace design and ergonomics training was conducted to examine the effects on psychosocial work environment, musculoskeletal health, and work effectiveness in a computer-based office setting. Knowledge workers were assigned to one of four conditions: flexible workspace (n=121), ergonomics training (n=92), flexible workspace+ergonomics training (n=31), and a no-intervention control (n=45). Outcome measures were collected 2 months prior to the intervention and 3 and 6 months post-intervention. Overall, the study results indicated positive, significant effects on the outcome variables for the two intervention groups compared to the control group, including work-related musculoskeletal discomfort, job control, environmental satisfaction, sense of community, ergonomic climate, communication and collaboration, and business process efficiency (time and costs). However, attrition of workers in the ergonomics training condition precluded an evaluation of the effects of this intervention. This study suggests that a macroergonomics intervention is effective among knowledge workers in office settings.
开展了一项宏观工效学干预措施,包括灵活的工作空间设计和工效学培训,以研究其在基于计算机的办公环境中对心理社会工作环境、肌肉骨骼健康和工作效率的影响。知识工作者被分配到四种情况之一:灵活的工作空间(n = 121)、工效学培训(n = 92)、灵活的工作空间+工效学培训(n = 31)和无干预对照组(n = 45)。在干预前2个月以及干预后3个月和6个月收集结果指标。总体而言,研究结果表明,与对照组相比,两个干预组在结果变量上有积极、显著的影响,包括与工作相关的肌肉骨骼不适、工作控制、环境满意度、社区感、工效学氛围、沟通与协作以及业务流程效率(时间和成本)。然而,接受工效学培训的工作人员流失使得无法评估该干预措施的效果。这项研究表明,宏观工效学干预措施在办公环境中的知识工作者中是有效的。