Kikkawa Takuma, Mai M, Isaka T, Wachi N, Aoshima H, Shimizu T, Ikeda T, Oyama K, Murasugi M, Oonuki T
First Department of Surgery, Tokyo Womens' Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyobu Geka. 2008 May;61(5):371-4.
We report on an extremely elderly patient in whom we were unable to insert a pacing lead via the subclavian or internal jugular vein because of a superior vena cava obstruction; we instead inserted the pacing lead via the femoral vein. The patient was a 98-year-old male. Thirty-nine years previously, pacemaker implantation was performed for complete atrioventricular block. Afterwards, pacemaker replacement and reimplantation had been performed a total of 15 times. The patient was recently admitted because of pacing failure. Pacemaker replacement was performed, but pacing was not possible because of disconnection of the pacing lead. Insertion of a new pacing lead was attempted via both subclavian veins and the right jugular vein but failed; this approach was abandoned and temporary pacing was done. Superior vena cava obstruction was noted on chest computed tomography (CT), and pacing lead insertion through the superior vena cava was deemed unfeasible. Myocardial electrode implantation was also considered, but general anesthesia was deemed problematic because of the patient's extreme age. A pacing lead was inserted via the right femoral vein, and the generator was implanted in the right lower abdomen. Postoperative pacing was satisfactory.
我们报告了一位极度高龄的患者,由于上腔静脉阻塞,我们无法通过锁骨下静脉或颈内静脉插入起搏导线;于是我们改为通过股静脉插入起搏导线。该患者为一名98岁男性。39年前,因完全性房室传导阻滞进行了起搏器植入术。此后,起搏器更换和重新植入共进行了15次。患者近期因起搏失败入院。进行了起搏器更换,但由于起搏导线断开无法起搏。尝试通过双侧锁骨下静脉和右颈静脉插入新的起搏导线,但均失败;于是放弃该方法并进行了临时起搏。胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)显示上腔静脉阻塞,经上腔静脉插入起搏导线被认为不可行。也曾考虑心肌电极植入,但由于患者年龄极大,全身麻醉被认为存在问题。通过右股静脉插入了起搏导线,并将发生器植入右下腹。术后起搏效果良好。