Suppr超能文献

优化粪便厌氧消化的物流。

Optimizing the logistics of anaerobic digestion of manure.

作者信息

Ghafoori Emad, Flynn Peter C

机构信息

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;137-140(1-12):625-37. doi: 10.1007/s12010-007-9084-9.

Abstract

Electrical power production from the combustion of biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD) of manure is a means of recovering energy from animal waste. We evaluate the lowest cost method of moving material to and from centralized AD plants serving multiple confined feeding operations. Two areas are modeled, Lethbridge County, Alberta, Canada, an area of concentrated beef cattle feedlots, and Red Deer County, Alberta, a mixed-farming area with hog, dairy, chicken and beef cattle farms, and feedlots. We evaluate two types of AD plant: ones that return digestate to the source confined feeding operation for land spreading (current technology), and ones that process digestate to produce solid fertilizer and a dischargeable water stream (technology under development). We evaluate manure and digestate trucking, trucking of manure with return of digestate by pipelines, and pipelining of manure plus digestate. We compare the overall cost of power from these scenarios to farm or feedlot-based AD units. For a centralized AD plant with digestate return for land spreading the most economical transport option for manure plus digestate is by truck for the mixed-farming area and by pipelines for the concentrated feedlot area. For a centralized AD plant with digestate processing, the most economical transport option is trucking of manure for both cases.However, for the concentrated feedlot area, pipeline transport of manure is close in cost to trucking, and the impact of truck congestion would likely lead to selection of pipeline transport. For the mixed-farming area, centralized AD is more economical than for any individual farm or feedlot unit. For the concentrated feedlot area, a centralized AD plant is less economical than a feedlot-based AD unit more than 55,000 head (digestate return) and 300,000 head (digestate processing). The study demonstrates the viability of centralized AD plants vs farm-based units in most farming environments, and that careful analysis of the cost of pipeline vs truck transport of manure and digestate is required on a case-by-case basis.

摘要

通过对粪便进行厌氧消化(AD)产生的沼气燃烧来发电,是一种从动物粪便中回收能量的方式。我们评估了将物料运送至服务多个封闭式饲养场的集中式厌氧消化厂以及从该厂运出物料的最低成本方法。对两个地区进行了建模分析,一个是加拿大艾伯塔省莱斯布里奇县,这是一个肉牛饲养场集中的地区;另一个是艾伯塔省红鹿县,这是一个有养猪场、奶牛场、养鸡场、肉牛饲养场和育肥场的混合农业区。我们评估了两种类型的厌氧消化厂:一种是将消化残渣返回至源头封闭式饲养场用于土地施肥(现有技术),另一种是对消化残渣进行处理以生产固体肥料和可排放水流(正在研发的技术)。我们评估了粪便和消化残渣的卡车运输、粪便卡车运输并通过管道返回消化残渣,以及粪便加消化残渣的管道输送。我们将这些方案产生电力的总成本与农场或饲养场的厌氧消化装置进行了比较。对于一个将消化残渣返回用于土地施肥的集中式厌氧消化厂,在混合农业区,粪便加消化残渣最经济的运输方式是卡车运输;在集中饲养场地区,则是管道运输。对于一个对消化残渣进行处理的集中式厌氧消化厂,在两种情况下最经济的运输方式都是粪便卡车运输。然而,对于集中饲养场地区,粪便的管道运输成本与卡车运输相近,而且卡车拥堵的影响可能会导致选择管道运输。对于混合农业区,集中式厌氧消化比任何单个农场或饲养场装置都更经济。对于集中饲养场地区,一个集中式厌氧消化厂比存栏超过55000头(消化残渣返回)和300000头(消化残渣处理)的基于饲养场的厌氧消化装置成本更高。该研究表明,在大多数农业环境中,集中式厌氧消化厂相对于基于农场的装置是可行的,并且需要根据具体情况仔细分析粪便和消化残渣的管道运输与卡车运输成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验